OK. Munson gets injured, leaving me with 1 catcher, Vic Correll (a 4(+2) scrub). Late in a game, HAL decides that since Correll is marked as "remove for defensive replacement," that apparently is an imperitive. Because Jerry Royster (sort of the definition of "not a catcher") is brought in to play catcher late in the game. Correll is fine...he's not hurt, he's a catcher, he's playing catcher, he doesn't get pinch hit for or pinch run for, he just gets taken out in favor of Royster. Note that Royster not only is not a catcher, he's not even listed among the defensive replacement choices for the positions he DOES play. Why in the world would HAL do that? Do non-catchers somehow have better arms/ranges/passed-balll/error ratings than 4(+2) guys?
wtf?
(I really want to know actually, because it makes me think I should never mark people to be replaced defensively)
http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/baseball/stratomatic/70s/league/boxscore.html?group_id=17141&g_id=357