by Jerlins » Wed Apr 28, 2010 10:01 pm
The problem with a veto application is that some, if not most, would use it to deny what is a very acceptable trade for the sole purpose of blocking a trade they think would improve a team they are competing against division wise. There are ways to to eliminate collusion. It can be programmed, though not worth TSN's time or money to do so, especially since these are rare and extreme cases.
Collusion is difficult to prove, and in most cases, almost impossible to even detect, unless, as in this case, it's so blatant. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this one out though. I'd be very surprised if credits were not given to those in the league, in spite of the original decision. Maybe they already have, and at TSN's (Bernie's) request, kept from the public to avoid abuse of meaningless charges of collusion:
Dear SOM player,
While it's not TSN's policy to refund credits, it's obvious in the case of League XXXXX that the charge of collusion is well founded. At this time we see no other option other than to issue you a credit. We request that this credit remain private, as public knowledge of this decision would lead to numerous requests for credits on the suspicion of any collusion that most likely is unfounded. We appreciate your continued patronage of our products, and hope that our decision to issue you a credit is satisfactory. Thank you.