I know we hashed this around a couple times when we were still recruiting owners, but I am still a little fuzzy on the answer. Looking over the nominees so far, it seems that we are bound to end up in a situation where the remaining players to be drafted will not necessarily fit the drafting team's final positional needs. This will especially be true for the last few picks for at least 1 or 2 teams, I would guess.
I presume most teams will draft their superstars relatively early and thus may have limited ability to use these two slots to fill remaining positional needs. And though many of the nominated players play multiple positions, there are quite a few that are one dimensional (i.e. SS only, 1B only). Let's say I draft my first 23 players and somehow still do not have a third basement or a right fielder yet. And further, what if there are simply no players among the remaining nominee field that play those positions? I presume I will be compelled at that point to draft another player and then let HAL set my lineup and force players in that position (at a fielding proficiency of 5, as I believe it works). The lineup function will not allow us to force a player into a position that he is not rated for, but will force someone there if you leave that position open in your lineup. But who knows whom HAL might pick?
If we all have the same risk, I am fine with this outcome, as it adds an important element to our drafting plan. I just want to be sure I understand the situation before we get going. Plus, if there is only one SS left and I see another owner is short one, it may compell one of us to grab that SS (even if you have plenty already) so that owner would have to start a 5 there (almost as bad as Paul Schaal!).
Thanks - this is starting to sound more fun all the time!