No, We do not need to lotto them- just looking for randomness, And since you are kind and competent enough to do the hard work- we will, starting with the 2011 season do the divisions by the previous season records.
Sgt D pmd and said he will take his team if we need him so, I'll post for two replacement managers tonight.
200/60 Keeper League- Year 4
by tcochran » Wed Jun 08, 2011 7:07 pm
Hey KD, I actually do not care how the random divisions are organized, however I am curious -- this is like a puzzle that's been baffling me all day.
How were the divs in the latest spreadsheet determined? If it was not by lotto, then I can't find any sequencing that works: Not the combined records, not the 200 mil record, not the 60 mil record.
Help me out of my misery. How'd you do it?!?
How were the divs in the latest spreadsheet determined? If it was not by lotto, then I can't find any sequencing that works: Not the combined records, not the 200 mil record, not the 60 mil record.
Help me out of my misery. How'd you do it?!?
- tcochran
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by kaviksdad » Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:35 am
[quote:7fe0dba2bf="tcochran"]Hey KD, I actually do not care how the random divisions are organized, however I am curious -- this is like a puzzle that's been baffling me all day.
How were the divs in the latest spreadsheet determined? If it was not by lotto, then I can't find any sequencing that works: Not the combined records, not the 200 mil record, not the 60 mil record.
Help me out of my misery. How'd you do it?!?[/quote:7fe0dba2bf]
You're referring to the way they look on the 'combined' tab? That's just random - think I cut and paste just to get it all together. And it is random - I can't come up with anything to make that look like 'official' either.
The divisions on the 'Parks' tabs are done with last year's combined record and they ARE accurate as we go to performance as basis for divisional assignments (thanks Terry!!)
How were the divs in the latest spreadsheet determined? If it was not by lotto, then I can't find any sequencing that works: Not the combined records, not the 200 mil record, not the 60 mil record.
Help me out of my misery. How'd you do it?!?[/quote:7fe0dba2bf]
You're referring to the way they look on the 'combined' tab? That's just random - think I cut and paste just to get it all together. And it is random - I can't come up with anything to make that look like 'official' either.
The divisions on the 'Parks' tabs are done with last year's combined record and they ARE accurate as we go to performance as basis for divisional assignments (thanks Terry!!)
- kaviksdad
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by tcochran » Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:58 am
[quote:1be29f5570="kaviksdad"][quote:1be29f5570="tcochran"]Hey KD, I actually do not care how the random divisions are organized, however I am curious -- this is like a puzzle that's been baffling me all day.
How were the divs in the latest spreadsheet determined? If it was not by lotto, then I can't find any sequencing that works: Not the combined records, not the 200 mil record, not the 60 mil record.
Help me out of my misery. How'd you do it?!?[/quote:1be29f5570]
You're referring to the way they look on the 'combined' tab? That's just random - think I cut and paste just to get it all together. And it is random - I can't come up with anything to make that look like 'official' either.
The divisions on the 'Parks' tabs are done with last year's combined record and they ARE accurate as we go to performance as basis for divisional assignments (thanks Terry!!)[/quote:1be29f5570]
OK, thanks!
How were the divs in the latest spreadsheet determined? If it was not by lotto, then I can't find any sequencing that works: Not the combined records, not the 200 mil record, not the 60 mil record.
Help me out of my misery. How'd you do it?!?[/quote:1be29f5570]
You're referring to the way they look on the 'combined' tab? That's just random - think I cut and paste just to get it all together. And it is random - I can't come up with anything to make that look like 'official' either.
The divisions on the 'Parks' tabs are done with last year's combined record and they ARE accurate as we go to performance as basis for divisional assignments (thanks Terry!!)[/quote:1be29f5570]
OK, thanks!
- tcochran
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by kaviksdad » Fri Jun 10, 2011 3:01 pm
Kev - just emailed the roster update to you.
The open team for sure is Bbasebrawl's. There's been no word from Ineluki, so that one might be open.
I know that Sgt. D was a fill in last year, and it looks like he will again this year. Not sure if he's doing it because he WANTS to, or whether he's helping Terry out again.
The open team for sure is Bbasebrawl's. There's been no word from Ineluki, so that one might be open.
I know that Sgt. D was a fill in last year, and it looks like he will again this year. Not sure if he's doing it because he WANTS to, or whether he's helping Terry out again.
- kaviksdad
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by KEVINEHLE » Fri Jun 10, 2011 4:13 pm
Hey Tom, since I was first in, I will grab bbasebrawl's team. I just checked his roster. Believe you me.......you're not missing much!!! :cry:
Kev
*Terry/Kav, Can we change our stadiums since we are new here?
Kev
*Terry/Kav, Can we change our stadiums since we are new here?
- KEVINEHLE
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
Return to Individual League Chat
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests