by jflatour99 » Sat Jun 11, 2011 9:54 am
Exactly.
In the past years, everyone was ask to place them at the top of the list but last year, for the first time, there has been a major bug:
A manager forgot to place em a the top. Instead, he placed them at the end and the other managers were penalized...
Originally, we placed keepers at the top to be sure that our keepers weren't take for a second player. Ex: Someone want a RF. He picks J.Heyward but someone else place him higher. Instead of Heyward, he gets A.Huff (a keeper). That was our supposition.
After the bug, I wrote to Strato and also, Herge (a experienced player that was in our league then) both told us that I should be ok to place protected players at the end if no one reclaim them. That in the example of Heyward, It would be Cruz that would be given because that someone (the proprietary of A.Huff) have selected Huff (even at the end).
Here's the Strato response:
[quote:5644bfd8db]Dear Member,
In theory, as long as no one but the manager “protecting” them has them on their draft card, they should end up on the proper teams. However, to be safe it probably would be best if the league made the protected players the highest priority. As long as the entire league does it, there is no advantage gained for anyone as everyone’s first priority non protected player would be listed 6th. Going forward, it’s probably best to do it that way.
Please let us know if there is anything else we can take care of for you.
Sincerely,
SN Member Services[/quote:5644bfd8db]