Winning streaks
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Winning streaks
by Neil Toomey » Fri Jun 24, 2011 9:33 pm
Anyone have an idea?... what is the longest winning streak.
- Neil Toomey
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
As MC Hammer would say--
by apolivka » Mon Jun 27, 2011 1:33 pm
http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/stratomatic/league/boxscore.html?group_id=31043&g_id=971
Yes, it was a theme league. Every team tried to lose as many games as possible, except one which had all the superstars on it. Basically it's now the model for debunking the "normalization" discussions that come up from time to time. If a team is really better, it will win, maybe, 100 games in a row.... :)
So, it's completely unfair, but it's the record to shoot for!
And, no, this team didn't lose to the wild card in the 1st round, but that would have been hilarious.
Yes, it was a theme league. Every team tried to lose as many games as possible, except one which had all the superstars on it. Basically it's now the model for debunking the "normalization" discussions that come up from time to time. If a team is really better, it will win, maybe, 100 games in a row.... :)
So, it's completely unfair, but it's the record to shoot for!
And, no, this team didn't lose to the wild card in the 1st round, but that would have been hilarious.
- apolivka
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
Re: As MC Hammer would say--
by wavygravy2k » Mon Jun 27, 2011 2:30 pm
[quote:86303fabc6="apolivka"]http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/stratomatic/league/boxscore.html?group_id=31043&g_id=971
Yes, it was a theme league. Every team tried to lose as many games as possible, except one which had all the superstars on it. Basically it's now the model for debunking the "normalization" discussions that come up from time to time. If a team is really better, it will win, maybe, 100 games in a row.... :)
So, it's completely unfair, but it's the record to shoot for!
And, no, this team didn't lose to the wild card in the 1st round, but that would have been hilarious.[/quote:86303fabc6]
Too funny. 159-3
Yes, it was a theme league. Every team tried to lose as many games as possible, except one which had all the superstars on it. Basically it's now the model for debunking the "normalization" discussions that come up from time to time. If a team is really better, it will win, maybe, 100 games in a row.... :)
So, it's completely unfair, but it's the record to shoot for!
And, no, this team didn't lose to the wild card in the 1st round, but that would have been hilarious.[/quote:86303fabc6]
Too funny. 159-3
- wavygravy2k
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by apolivka » Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:38 pm
http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/stratomatic/team/team_other.html?user_id=80041
I've posted it several times before in other threads. Highlights:
Steroid RocketMan 41-0 0.56 ERA 24 shutouts 2 no hitters
Mike Scott with (only) 19 shutouts and led the team in losses with 2
.365 team BA
0.89 team ERA
51 dingers and 214 RBIs for Mattingly
Boggs hits .404
1 team blown save (by Rob Murphy with a 0.00 ERA no less)
etc. etc. :)
I've posted it several times before in other threads. Highlights:
Steroid RocketMan 41-0 0.56 ERA 24 shutouts 2 no hitters
Mike Scott with (only) 19 shutouts and led the team in losses with 2
.365 team BA
0.89 team ERA
51 dingers and 214 RBIs for Mattingly
Boggs hits .404
1 team blown save (by Rob Murphy with a 0.00 ERA no less)
etc. etc. :)
- apolivka
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball Online 20xx
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests