by 216 Stitches » Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:22 am
[quote:c228945b57="El-Saltman"]I think that is an excellent point made about the List.
TBH- now that everyone has the list of where we drafted it makes it much more imperative that we get as many new players in as soon as possible, to shake up the now predetermined approximate placement of the current card set.
Therefore, Id put adding as many player cards as quickly as possible to be of much more value to me than fixing the auto-draft system, which I do think can be improved, but takes a big back seat to breathing more life into the Live and high cap drafts first and making it more interesting in the lower ones as well.[/quote:c228945b57]
I think I will respond to this email. You still have read Petrosian's comment to know what I am talking about, but there are some statements in the original (let me loosely paraphrase): I need
my experience benefits against newbies to maintain my .540
winning percentage which deserve a firm: no comment.
Agreement: the average draft lists provide some leveling of the player
field. And perhaps for the two posters, its "all they got"
Disagreement:
(1) its not that much if you just pay attention -- the TSN rating is not
that far off the lists, it has one major flaw for comparison sake (no
positional scarcity consideration) and several minor ones (no help on platoon combos). But the average draft list is not that far off the TSN
rating.
(2) their are several managers that are using strategies beyond what
you can see or find in the average draft list. Now I had already
guessed that Petro or Salt aren't, we are in leagues together I can
see that. And in another league there were comments that Nev sucks
so bad at LIVE drafts he won't even play in the things anymore. But
when I posted the ATG5 average LIVE draft list 15 months ago, I
commented I wasn't posting it until I was a step ahead of it. Salt
laughed at me. Fine by me.
Agreement: the new (AeroDave) average draft list has some
unfortunate side affects. Foremost, he never played in most of these
leagues. Using data mining to grab data against human opponents
is considered as bad as collusion in other on-line games and can
get your account suspended and thrown off the site permanently (i.e,.
on-line poker). If Petro is upset for me for posting the 17 team
average draft, than I say "tough." Its my information, I played in
those leauges, if I want to share it with the whole community, its
my right. "Deal with it." Or get upset with me. But now data mining
is going on where no one has played in the leagues and Bernie has
shared tools with singular managers to extract data that only they can
see. This makes me very uncomfortable.
Disagreement: well, the Diamond Dope Actuals information is also
data mining. If you are upset with losing an edge based on playing
experience, than the DD Actuals should also be in the discussion. I
know they are differences, but to me, .. if I am upset with AeroDave,
I have to be upset with Adrian. And Bernie (i.e., TSN) gave
AeroDave the tools to do this.
Personally, I wouldn't mind if TSN compiled a running average draft
list by themselves for everyone to see. Or at least, came up with a
formula for a TSN ranking that incorporated the positional scarcity and
platoon values of player, essentially coming much closer to an average
draft position ranking.