Archive of SportingNews.com's old SOM Baseball forum

by **nevdully's** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:09 am

I know I'm alone on this island but too many cards and too many parks.

btw if this is rabid retired I'd hate to see him active.

by **TRW** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:53 am

[quote:60abbbee65="nevdully's"]I know I'm alone on this island but too many cards and too many parks.

btw if this is rabid retired I'd hate to see him active.[/quote:60abbbee65]

I am recovering from surgery with nothing else to do...except put my 2 cents in where ever I can... lol

by **rjohaire** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 8:23 am

I think ModMark's idea is a bullseye - we need more flexibility in alot of things - ball parks would be a nice start

Designer Parks - YES

by **Salty** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 8:51 am

Im not necessarily looking for designer parks-

but the ones I mentioned will open up more strategies for some folks-
and Id like them to be based on actual parks, which is why a general range is okay rather than exact numbers-

although maybe my range is pretty narrow?

by **TRW** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 8:53 am

[quote:62af4e328b="rjoh"]I think ModMark's idea is a bullseye - we need more flexibility in alot of things - ball parks would be a nice start

Designer Parks - YES[/quote:62af4e328b]

I am sure this will be a new feature when Bernie rolls out ATG7 in a couple of months.

:roll: :roll: :lol: :lol:

by **PotKettleBlack** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:02 am

[quote:4fde73ea62="nevdully's"]I know I'm alone on this island but too many cards and too many parks.[/quote:4fde73ea62]

Two for the island of too many parks.

More parks equals longer random park league commitments. Not sure if that's a :D or a :cry:

by **TRW** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:26 am

[quote:57e174f75b="PotKettleBlack"][quote:57e174f75b="nevdully's"]I know I'm alone on this island but too many cards and too many parks.[/quote:57e174f75b]

Two for the island of too many parks.

More parks equals longer random park league commitments. Not sure if that's a :D or a :cry:[/quote:57e174f75b]

What if all parks that have not been used or rarely used to this point are deleted and new parks are added. I am for new parks as long as they re not duplicating available park dimensions.

El-Saltman - just looking at your 1st 3 park requests...

Isn't Wrigley 63, Washington Park & Connie Mack are close to those 3 requests..

by **Blutarsky** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:36 am

[quote:ede6a44fd4="PotKettleBlack"][quote:ede6a44fd4="nevdully's"]I know I'm alone on this island but too many cards and too many parks.[/quote:ede6a44fd4]

Two for the island of too many parks.

More parks equals longer random park league commitments. Not sure if that's a :D or a :cry:[/quote:ede6a44fd4]

Me three

by **Blutarsky** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:42 am

Also, please count me against the "make your own ballpark" concept. That seems to me like a slippery slope that leads up to creating your own player cards and I'm really not digging that idea.

by **TRW** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:47 am

[quote:94ff529bc0="budo73"]Also, please count me against the "make your own ballpark" concept. That seems to me like a slippery slope that leads up to creating your own player cards and I'm really not digging that idea.[/quote:94ff529bc0]

Great idea. I want Johnny Slider on my team or Johnny Strikeout.

:lol:

Archive of SportingNews.com's old SOM Baseball forum

Bernie- New Ballparks???

Who is online