Bernie- New Ballparks???
37 posts
• Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
by Salty » Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:05 am
[quote:0d377b7b08]="The Rabid Wolverines"
El-Saltman - just looking at your 1st 3 park requests...
Isn't Wrigley 63, Washington Park & Connie Mack are close to those 3 requests..[/quote:0d377b7b08]
I actually use Washington Park a good deal- so far no copy cats, probably because I havent won there yet.
Wrigley 63 does not fit, but Connie Mack is close, and is on my list to use- but isnt quite what Id like because the HRs are a bit higher than what Id want.
El-Saltman - just looking at your 1st 3 park requests...
Isn't Wrigley 63, Washington Park & Connie Mack are close to those 3 requests..[/quote:0d377b7b08]
I actually use Washington Park a good deal- so far no copy cats, probably because I havent won there yet.
Wrigley 63 does not fit, but Connie Mack is close, and is on my list to use- but isnt quite what Id like because the HRs are a bit higher than what Id want.
- Salty
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by doug_tucker10 » Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:06 pm
I like the idea of designer parks, have suggested it a couple of times before.
- doug_tucker10
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by PotKettleBlack » Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:43 pm
[quote:98257c3c56="The Rabid Wolverines"][quote:98257c3c56="PotKettleBlack"][quote:98257c3c56="nevdully's"]I know I'm alone on this island but too many cards and too many parks.[/quote:98257c3c56]
Two for the island of too many parks.
More parks equals longer random park league commitments. Not sure if that's a :D or a :cry:[/quote:98257c3c56]
What if all parks that have not been used or rarely used to this point are deleted and new parks are added. I am for new parks as long as they re not duplicating available park dimensions.
[/quote:98257c3c56]
Kooky idea:
Instead of all parks that have not been used (zero... random park leagues accomplish that since we played the whole series of parks the first go) or rarely used, how about giving the most frequently used parks a 6 month vacation?
Two for the island of too many parks.
More parks equals longer random park league commitments. Not sure if that's a :D or a :cry:[/quote:98257c3c56]
What if all parks that have not been used or rarely used to this point are deleted and new parks are added. I am for new parks as long as they re not duplicating available park dimensions.
[/quote:98257c3c56]
Kooky idea:
Instead of all parks that have not been used (zero... random park leagues accomplish that since we played the whole series of parks the first go) or rarely used, how about giving the most frequently used parks a 6 month vacation?
- PotKettleBlack
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by dwightskino211 » Thu Oct 13, 2011 6:30 pm
Please make it an option for the league's design choices (there's a thought) that it cost a draft pick to pick your park before/during the draft, free if after the draft, and when a park is picked it's gone. No more 3 hilltops in a division etc.
- dwightskino211
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by TRW » Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:51 pm
[quote:03c84f0616="PotKettleBlack"][quote:03c84f0616="The Rabid Wolverines"][quote:03c84f0616="PotKettleBlack"][quote:03c84f0616="nevdully's"]I know I'm alone on this island but too many cards and too many parks.[/quote:03c84f0616]
Two for the island of too many parks.
More parks equals longer random park league commitments. Not sure if that's a :D or a :cry:[/quote:03c84f0616]
What if all parks that have not been used or rarely used to this point are deleted and new parks are added. I am for new parks as long as they re not duplicating available park dimensions.
[/quote:03c84f0616]
Kooky idea:
Instead of all parks that have not been used (zero... random park leagues accomplish that since we played the whole series of parks the first go) or rarely used, how about giving the most frequently used parks a 6 month vacation?[/quote:03c84f0616]
I prefer your idea over the one I posted. I actually was thinking that myself, but I figured too many guys would be against getting rid of stadiums they have had success in.
Two for the island of too many parks.
More parks equals longer random park league commitments. Not sure if that's a :D or a :cry:[/quote:03c84f0616]
What if all parks that have not been used or rarely used to this point are deleted and new parks are added. I am for new parks as long as they re not duplicating available park dimensions.
[/quote:03c84f0616]
Kooky idea:
Instead of all parks that have not been used (zero... random park leagues accomplish that since we played the whole series of parks the first go) or rarely used, how about giving the most frequently used parks a 6 month vacation?[/quote:03c84f0616]
I prefer your idea over the one I posted. I actually was thinking that myself, but I figured too many guys would be against getting rid of stadiums they have had success in.
- TRW
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by The Last Druid » Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:31 pm
Prefer to keep the current park format with additional new parks to choose from.
[color=red:c9c4d5100b]Continued strong preference for the [size=24:c9c4d5100b]home field advantage to be turned off[/size:c9c4d5100b][/color:c9c4d5100b]
[color=red:c9c4d5100b]Continued strong preference for the [size=24:c9c4d5100b]home field advantage to be turned off[/size:c9c4d5100b][/color:c9c4d5100b]
- The Last Druid
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by Salty » Sat Oct 15, 2011 11:16 am
that would be mine as well.
I dont have a problem with getting rid of BPs that seemingly duplicate things and are unused, but with the new cards coming in, there are hopefully a few more that might start to get played-
I have in mind to use a couple, but need one or two of the right cards more to make it work.
PS- Molitor or some such might just fit the bill for one of em.
I dont have a problem with getting rid of BPs that seemingly duplicate things and are unused, but with the new cards coming in, there are hopefully a few more that might start to get played-
I have in mind to use a couple, but need one or two of the right cards more to make it work.
PS- Molitor or some such might just fit the bill for one of em.
- Salty
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
37 posts
• Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball: All-Time Greats
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests