Paging PKBlack Enter your team - Theme League - ERA vs. ERA!

Postby honestiago1 » Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:35 pm

1) 1800's-1910
2) 1911-1919
3) 1920-1929
4) 1930-1939
5) 1940-1949
6) 1950-1959
7) 1960-1969 - johnnyblazers
8) 1970-1979
9) 1980-1989--honestiago
10) 1990-present
11) Negro Leagues-I
12) Negro Leagues II
honestiago1
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby honestiago1 » Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:36 pm

Does this mean I HAVE to use Royals Stadium '80, since it is the only park listed for the 80s?
honestiago1
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby honestiago1 » Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:44 pm

Most of the '78 parks were still in use in the 80s. How about we say the park has to actually be in use during the decade? Because I think there's a lot of decades without parks, and constraining managers to one park choice gives other managers an unfair advantage.
honestiago1
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby JohnnyBlazers » Fri Oct 28, 2011 1:01 pm

[quote:2278c908d9="honestiago"]Does this mean I HAVE to use Royals Stadium '80, since it is the only park listed for the 80s?[/quote:2278c908d9]

I guess we'll have to get creative to make this work - say any 70's & 80's parks?
JohnnyBlazers
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Ideas/Revisions

Postby JohnnyBlazers » Fri Oct 28, 2011 1:12 pm

[quote:fcd5c4edb2="honestiago"]Most of the '78 parks were still in use in the 80s. [b:fcd5c4edb2]How about we say the park has to actually be in use during the decade? [/b:fcd5c4edb2]Because I think there's a lot of decades without parks, and constraining managers to one park choice gives other managers an unfair advantage.[/quote:fcd5c4edb2]

I agree with you - let's go that route instead.

For the NEL teams and the lack of relievers - how about any relievers left over after the draft are fair game for the NEL teams only?

Regarding the CAP - I like the 100 Cap idea - I think going 120 will give the modern teams too much of an advantage in regards to power hitting vs. the earlier era teams, however, if we can get a consensus on this issue, we can go the way that the masses want.
JohnnyBlazers
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby JohnnyBlazers » Fri Oct 28, 2011 1:15 pm

1) 1800's-1910 - OakAth72
2) 1911-1919
3) 1920-1929 - PKBlack
4) 1930-1939
5) 1940-1949
6) 1950-1959
7) 1960-1969 - johnnyblazers
8) 1970-1979
9) 1980-1989
10) 1990-present - Modmark
11) Negro Leagues-I
12) Negro Leagues II
JohnnyBlazers
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby honestiago1 » Fri Oct 28, 2011 1:48 pm

Already have a roster ready to go. :-) Now, which park, hmmm...
honestiago1
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby JohnnyBlazers » Fri Oct 28, 2011 2:35 pm

1) 1800's-1910 - OakAth72
2) 1911-1919
3) 1920-1929 - PKBlack
4) 1930-1939
5) 1940-1949
6) 1950-1959
7) 1960-1969 - johnnyblazers
8) 1970-1979
9) 1980-1989 - honestiago
10) 1990-present - Modmark
11) Negro Leagues-I
12) Negro Leagues II
JohnnyBlazers
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Re: Ideas/Revisions

Postby PotKettleBlack » Fri Oct 28, 2011 3:43 pm

[quote:26e8267645="johnnyblazers"][quote:26e8267645="honestiago"]Most of the '78 parks were still in use in the 80s. [b:26e8267645]How about we say the park has to actually be in use during the decade? [/b:26e8267645]Because I think there's a lot of decades without parks, and constraining managers to one park choice gives other managers an unfair advantage.[/quote:26e8267645]

I agree with you - let's go that route instead.

For the NEL teams and the lack of relievers - how about any relievers left over after the draft are fair game for the NEL teams only?

Regarding the CAP - I like the 100 Cap idea - I think going 120 will give the modern teams too much of an advantage in regards to power hitting vs. the earlier era teams, however, if we can get a consensus on this issue, we can go the way that the masses want.[/quote:26e8267645]

Hrm: My 20's team.

Let's see. 120 allows me to use the 15M Ruth with pretty much roster impunity. I can put together a 100M roster minus a LF/DH/1B, then add Ruth and $5M. I like.

The 1909 and before all stars can put together a .400 hitting outfield/dh rotation at 120, with some legit shut down starters.

The 10-19... hrm. They might have problems at the 120. Probably not. Add pitching as some of the best pitchers in the set...

30's... hitting decade. No problem.

I wouldn't worry about the early teams keeping up. Maybe not in isoP, but in TB, I think they can hang. I know the Roaring 20s can.
PotKettleBlack
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby mrharryc » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:22 pm

Pursuant to a line in an episode of Green Acres, "there's nothin' as refreshin' as a good long depression," I'll take the 30's.


1) 1800's-1910 - OakAth72
2) 1911-1919
3) 1920-1929 - PKBlack
4) 1930-1939 - mrharryc
5) 1940-1949
6) 1950-1959
7) 1960-1969 - johnnyblazers
8) 1970-1979
9) 1980-1989 - honestiago
10) 1990-present - Modmark
11) Negro Leagues-I
12) Negro Leagues II
mrharryc
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball: All-Time Greats

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

cron