Bernie: Arky Vaughan, 1935 -- special request for next batch

Postby rburgh » Mon Dec 05, 2011 10:47 pm

It might also be interesting to subdivide the ATG card sets into, say,

ATG 7 - with a focus on the greatest teams for individual franchises and eras

ATG 8 - with a focus on great player seasons

The card sets don't need to overlap. The above divide, with about 80 teams in the ATG 7 set, would have somewhere around 2000 players, and the ATG 8 set could be pared down to about 2500 by (a) deleting the el cheapo roster fillers that rarely get used, (b) limiting the set to about 3 cards per player, and (c) removing most of the overlaps.
rburgh
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby Outta Leftfield » Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:20 am

[quote:cfd0cc2e66="rburgh"]I'd be in favor of some contraction of the infrequently used cards, unless of course they fill out a roster for one of the many complete or nearly complete teams here.

Speaking of nearly complete teams, we could use "Pops" Stargell from 1979.[/quote:cfd0cc2e66]

I'd also be in favor of contraction of rarely used (aka [i:cfd0cc2e66]useless[/i:cfd0cc2e66]) cards which simply clutter up the set. That would make searching easier.

Among nearly completed teams, how about Yogi Berra's 1961 card, when he played mostly LF? Also, how about Elston Howard's and Bob Cerv's 1956?
Outta Leftfield
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby doug_tucker10 » Tue Dec 06, 2011 10:58 am

I wouldn't want to see a contraction only because all the cards are useful when you take into account theme leagues and franchise leagues. I do think it's almost redundant to add superstars with great cards if we already have one or two of their great seasons...for example i love Hornsby but have been finding his 11.53 card to be the most useful one. I'd rather add players who are currently cardless in the ATG set or upgrade any all time greats who currently have nothing to show but mediocre cards.
doug_tucker10
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby andycummings65 » Tue Dec 06, 2011 12:16 pm

I agree Doug. I dont want to contract any cards, they come in handy for my franchise and theme leagues. And I dont mind having 2 or 3 card options for players. But our pool is huge now.................
andycummings65
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby novie » Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:29 pm

What we TRULY need is the ability to search not only by era (ie Post-War Dodgers) but also by LA or Brooklyn. We really need to be able to sort by year or period of years, etc so that it is easier for Franchise type theme leagues.
novie
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby mikemartinfl » Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:34 pm

I second the Lonnie Smith inclusion.

would also like to see '96 Tony Phillips

1960 Roger Maris

1950 Larry Jansen
mikemartinfl
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Previous

Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball: All-Time Greats

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

cron