[quote:cbe7c9533c="PotKettleBlack"]I saw something on TLC about a man whose bicep literally exploded. Same kind of thing. Connective tissue failure.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sj3De6s3ZjQ
That's why roid guys tend to have durability issues after a 3-5 year peak.
You didn't notice because McGwire always had trouble staying in the game, was never anything but statuary with his feet, and you always felt he could make a run at 61 if he could just play 150+ games in a fair to favorable ballpark. At least I did. And really, you see he was healthy for a 3 year stretch, then his legs started to go away, and he couldn't drive the ball anymore. 3-5 year peak, then can't stay in the game or do the same things.
That's why I have trouble believing Clemens was on the juice from the get go, given his total innings pitched. What seems at least as plausible is that pitching in Boston got stale, or the coaching in Boston wore thin (I can see doing anything in Boston being grating, but then I'm a New Yorker at heart), so Boston gave up on him, New environment with the Jays led to a rebirth. Then he hits mid-late 30's and starts juicing because he can't do what he used to do.
The way folks assume roids with Bagwell really highlights the absurdity of the environment. Kind of like how people assume Albert Pujols is either older than his papers say or on HGH or something else baseball is failing to detect. When you put Bags in his context and accept that he was built like a hockey player, which he was, even in the minor leagues, you can accept that he hit 454 home runs without any helper beyond the ubiquitous greenies.[/quote:cbe7c9533c]
Good points on Bags and The Rocket ... and I wish the Roid Cheaters were not included in our ongoing All Time Greats cards.
Someone disparaged the new Arky Vaughan card further above -- how come? Is it not reflective of his greatest single season, as are the best cards each other Great has in our set?