Random Parks II

[MIKEGILBERT]

We're full and ready to frenzy tonight.

[emart]

I've been thinking about going with another round of the
Random theme in some form. I'd like it to be a little
different from what we are doing now, in some way, either
more or less complex (but not too complicated). I'm not sure which.

This has been a really fun theme and I've enjoyed all the live drafting and
playing in parks I never would have chosen myself.

Thoughts that have occurred to me include (I'm not sayin' I want to do these things, just thinkin'):

-using slightly higher salary caps (100-120m)
-potentially random team assignments (you get assigned a park, you draft, then we randomize to see [b:afaa7e83e3][i:afaa7e83e3]if [/i:afaa7e83e3][/b:afaa7e83e3]we randomize team assignments. Get it???)
-some keeper players???
-randomly assigned players?????


If you would like to go for another round of the Random
theme please check in. Comments welcome.

[drfreeze49]

I'm in with ever is decided....


Vinnie

[emart]

Interested in Random, round 3:

1. emart
2. drfreeze
3. rjoh
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

[thaibill]

Interested in Random, round 3:

1. emart
2. drfreeze
3. rjoh
4. thaibill
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

[rburgh]

Interested in Random, round 3:

1. emart
2. drfreeze
3. rjoh
4. thaibill
5. rburgh
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

[PotKettleBlack]

1. emart
2. drfreeze
3. rjoh
4. thaibill
5. rburgh
6. PKB (Junkie needs his fix)
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

[PotKettleBlack]

Random Parks: Yes.
Random higher caps: 100-120-140... yes.
Random teams: intriguing, but not necessarily interesting.
Keepers: Why? Why not? either way.

[rjohaire]

Random Parks: Yes.
Random higher caps: 100-120-140... yes. think u need an 80
Random teams: NO
Keepers: NO

[PotKettleBlack]

I don't really love playing 80 anymore. I left it out on purpose. Even though 80 is the "default."