Reelin' in the Years League

Postby jflatour99 » Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:03 am

For the initial prospect draft :

Because it's [b:72c115ea06]a new rule (added)[/b:72c115ea06], I propose we don't advantage or disadvantage anyone in particular. I think that this is too much arbitrary.

For the initial draft only, I propose a random way to attribute the orders and make it a snake style draft or x rounds (so, the person who gets the last pick would have another advantage).

BUT, for all subsequent prospect drafts, the worst record would always pick first non serpentine...

After all, there's already the free agents drat in place that give a chance to the worst records. I think that when we add a new rule (this important), we should stay neutral in the way we bring it aboard.
jflatour99
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby tcochran » Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:38 am

[quote:755f8bda97="lumbercompanysouth"]Lumber Drops

Iwamura
Teagarden
Wilson
German
Sheets
White
Andino
Miller
Broxton[/quote:755f8bda97]

Todd, please check your roster. I still show you with 31 after these drops.
tcochran
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Drops

Postby tcochran » Thu Mar 22, 2012 10:07 am

8 of 12 drops received so far.

Still need:

ggrover
killermarc
he's meat
manleeman
tcochran
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby lumbercompanysouth » Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:03 pm

great Pennsylvania education ..cant count all my digits

Westbrook
lumbercompanysouth
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby MEAT » Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:46 am

cruiser drops

1.belliard
2. inge
3. evans
4. sizemore
5.shoppach
6. washburn
7. f. garcia
8 correia
9 sipp
10 marte
11 paulino
12.matsui
MEAT
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby tcochran » Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:45 am

[quote:4b7f08961f="lumbercompanysouth"]great Pennsylvania education ..cant count all my digits

Westbrook[/quote:4b7f08961f]

Thanks :)
tcochran
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby padrenurgle1 » Fri Mar 23, 2012 1:26 pm

tcochrane should collect the proposed ideas and have the league vote on them.
padrenurgle1
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby tcochran » Fri Mar 23, 2012 1:58 pm

[quote:85d026c899="padrenurgle"]tcochrane should collect the proposed ideas and have the league vote on them.[/quote:85d026c899]

Agreed. Looking forward to a few more responses...
tcochran
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby padrenurgle1 » Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:49 pm

After tossing 11-1/3 scoreless postseason innings, Santana broke his arm tonight in game 7. We won the game and go to the finals, but without our cleanup hitter and without our #2 starter.
padrenurgle1
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Unleashed with mnimums

Postby tcochran » Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:09 am

The more I think about the idea of using [b:91e88d34fb]all[/b:91e88d34fb] cards -- but with minimums for [b:91e88d34fb]all[/b:91e88d34fb] cards -- the better I like it.

For example, if 100 AB were the minimum for hitters, then the following unleashed guys in the 2011 card set would be eligible to be used:
De Aza
Perez
Blanco

At a salary of $3.38, Snyder would be the most significant standard set player who would not be eligible to be used.

Likewise, for starting pitchers, if there were a 100 IP minimum, then no unleashed pitchers would be added to the draft and only Josh Johnson would be excluded.

Those all seem like reasonable limits to me.
tcochran
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Individual League Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests

cron