EXp era 2 team draft theme league - draft here

Postby doug_tucker10 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:46 pm

I'm out of here at 830 pm for work, enough time for me to pick.
doug_tucker10
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby 2cityfan » Thu Mar 29, 2012 3:34 pm

you guys are free to send me proxies if you want.. thanks

PS Visick, that is the most disturbing bump I have ever seen :-)
2cityfan
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby honestiago1 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:05 pm

Shoot. Clemens is a gd Blue Jay according to the league rules (speaking of, I'd have been better of taking the Blue Jays I think).

So, lemme get this straight: Toronto has the rights to draft Clemens in the AD. But it can use any version of Clemens? I ask because of this:

[quote:5801208268]4. For players with cards on multiple teams (i.e. Greg Maddux), the Auto drafting rights always go to the team with the higher dollar card. So if both the Cubs exp and ATL exp are selected, the manager who selected ATL (where Maddux has a higher dollar card) gets rights to him in the auto draft. If the ATL exp manager does not auto draft Maddux, the Cubs exp team can pick him up out of the free agent pool after the auto draft. If no manager selects ATL exp as one of the 24 selected exp teams, and a manager selected the Cubs exp.. the manager with Cubs exp would have exclusive rights to Maddux because he can only play for either the Cubs or Braves.

5. You can use any EXP era version of a player you have rights to. So if the A's get Willie Randolph because the Yankees go with Cano at 2b, and do not auto draft him, the A's can use the higher dollar versions of Randolph from his Yankee days. [/quote:5801208268]

Shouldn't a team be forced to use the players that are carded for their teams during the AD phase? I understand having some flexibility afterward, but it seems unfair that the Jays could autodraft a cheaper version of Clemens, simply based on the fact that they have the highest rated year. You run into the same thing with Pedro and Montreal. The Expos can draft Pedro, but can take one of his cheaper cards.

(P.S. Sorry I did not catch this earlier -- and I won't bail out, having signed on already--just strikes me as an unfair advantage)
honestiago1
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby visick » Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:12 pm

It seems like people could get screwed by battling it out for players in the AD.

At least you are assured of getting that stud SP or bat before the AD.

So if you own Pedro or Maddux, I don't see the problem with using a lesser card.

visick
visick
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby dukie98 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:17 pm

Since there's a way to go before my pick, I can also process proxies.
dukie98
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby visick » Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:26 pm

Thanks 2cityfan...

That's actually Frank M. riding the bus to work.
visick
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby rburgh » Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:53 pm

RD 1
6 bontomn - HOU EXP
1.2cityfan - CIN
2 honestiago - BOS Exp
8 Frank M - SF Giants
10 rburgh - STL Cards
5 Jamesgang77
9 Visick
7 lloyd
12 Roosky
11 dukie98
3 Warreenbob
4 andycummings

RD 2
4 andycummings
3 Warreenbob
11 dukie98
12 Roosky
7 lloyd
9 Visick
5 Jamesgang77
10 rburgh
8 Frank M
2 honestiago
1.2cityfan
6 bontomn
2cityfan
rburgh
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby doug_tucker10 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:02 pm

RD 1
6 bontomn - HOU EXP
1.2cityfan - CIN
2 honestiago - BOS Exp
8 Frank M - SF Giants
10 rburgh - STL Cards
5 Jamesgang77 KC Royals
9 Visick
7 lloyd
12 Roosky
11 dukie98
3 Warreenbob
4 andycummings

RD 2
4 andycummings
3 Warreenbob
11 dukie98
12 Roosky
7 lloyd
9 Visick
5 Jamesgang77
10 rburgh
8 Frank M
2 honestiago
1.2cityfan
6 bontomn
2cityfan
doug_tucker10
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby visick » Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:08 pm

RD 1
6 bontomn - HOU EXP
1.2cityfan - CIN
2 honestiago - BOS Exp
8 Frank M - SF Giants
10 rburgh - STL Cards
5 Jamesgang77 KC Royals
9 Visick- NYY (Hard taking them as a Mets fan...)

7 [b:58deb90c0c]lloyd [/b:58deb90c0c]

12 Roosky
11 dukie98
3 Warreenbob
4 andycummings

RD 2
4 andycummings
3 Warreenbob
11 dukie98
12 Roosky
7 lloyd
9 Visick
5 Jamesgang77
10 rburgh
8 Frank M
2 honestiago
1.2cityfan
6 bontomn
2cityfan
visick
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby honestiago1 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:10 pm

[quote:69fecadc24="socalchiro"]It seems like people could get screwed by battling it out for players in the AD.

At least you are assured of getting that stud SP or bat before the AD.

So if you own Pedro or Maddux, I don't see the problem with using a lesser card.

visick[/quote:69fecadc24]

I understand having the rule to determine ownership. What I was saying was that I feel like the team AD'ing the player should use the card that applies to the team. After that, it's whoever can claim ownership.
honestiago1
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Individual League Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests