Mathews '53

Mathews '53

Postby OakAth72 » Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:59 am

Mathews is putting up Bonds type numbers for me and was wondering if this is going to be the norm for the card. I'm not playing in very many leagues right now since his new card came out so I was hoping managers can post some other examples good or bad.

http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/stratomatic/team/team_other.html?user_id=375843&stats=sim&onroster=1
OakAth72
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby Munich_Man » Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:21 am

Totally raking on another team-- http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/stratomatic/team/team_other.html?user_id=376169
Munich_Man
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby WeatherNut » Sun Apr 01, 2012 12:03 pm

DHing here and lighting it up.

http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/stratomatic/team/team_other.html?user_id=376927

WN
WeatherNut
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby djp_77 » Sun Apr 01, 2012 1:53 pm

http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/stratomatic/team/team_other.html?user_id=376236

mathews card makes the arky vaughan card look bad.
djp_77
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby Munich_Man » Sun Apr 01, 2012 2:44 pm

Great numbers, but I'll take Beckwith for 2 mil less and put up the same, or better, numbers.
Munich_Man
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby dharmabums » Sun Apr 01, 2012 4:49 pm

http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/stratomatic/team/team_other.html?user_id=378367

Doing okay. Would want better from my #1 pick though.
dharmabums
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby modmark46 » Sun Apr 01, 2012 9:37 pm

Playing in Ameriquest '05, $100m cap. At the half way point (81 games), the '53 Mathews leads the league in HRs (47), RBI (101), SLG% (.854) and is second in OPS (1.261 to Vaughans 1.262). Is batting .312. He's a monster!
modmark46
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby The Last Druid » Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:30 pm

Just another fantasim disaster that needs to be removed from the player pool.
The Last Druid
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

this is not just an offensive fantasy debate

Postby dspeters5 » Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:01 am

Petro, you fail to mention the plethora of hall of fame relief pitchers recently added. 100 mil leagues could have at least one and maybe more hall of fame relievers. 200 mil leagues every team could have 2 or 3 super relievers. Dale murray is being used 200 to 300 innings a season. People vehemently complain about arky. Napster and eddie and want cards removed but no one has asked for super relievers to be removed or strategies to be deprogramed, in my most recent 200 mil goldrush we are seeing zero increases in league wide OPS. WHIP or ERA. Maybe hal has balanced the additions. We now have a stud defensive 2b option for every team now with bret boone and knoblauchs new card added with jackie robinsons new card. CF also has many more great defenders with some pop. I am not complainin. I want an 11 mil Pop Lloyd card and a 11 mil smokey joe williams card that's what they deserve. I don't think that's gonna happen.[/u]
dspeters5
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Re: this is not just an offensive fantasy debate

Postby PotKettleBlack » Mon Apr 02, 2012 11:31 am

[quote:60e4043f29="dspeters5"]I want an 11 mil Pop Lloyd card and a 11 mil smokey joe williams card that's what they deserve. I don't think that's gonna happen.[/u][/quote:60e4043f29]

That's not gonna happen because their play doesn't merit it, as nearly as SOM can crunch what numbers exist. If you want them, start compiling stats for them that disprove the current career stats, as that's what SOM worked from.

I suppose we could price the current cards for SJ Williams and Pop Lloyd at $11M and that'd give you one interpretation of what you want. But I don't think anyone would use them.
PotKettleBlack
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Next

Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball: All-Time Greats

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

cron