Sayeth the Bomber:
[quote:8a97c86746]Which game? I think you if you trade Parker or Clemente it is only in one game and not all. If you trade one in the 70s game you still have them in ATG for example. [/quote:8a97c86746]
You are right, the trade would only apply to the 70s and not the other decades.
FATY IV - All 90s loaded by Thursday May 17th!!
by LMBombers » Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:41 pm
[quote:4165543bef="ggrover15"]i don't know about seattle.. i pick them last time.[/quote:4165543bef]
Check out Rob's web page link in the original post. All 24 team choices are spelled out there.
Question about a player. Mike Jackson in the 90's has 3 cards for SEA (a team not in this league) and 2 for SF. Does that mean that he is inelligible for the league or does SF have ownership?
Check out Rob's web page link in the original post. All 24 team choices are spelled out there.
Question about a player. Mike Jackson in the 90's has 3 cards for SEA (a team not in this league) and 2 for SF. Does that mean that he is inelligible for the league or does SF have ownership?
- LMBombers
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by YountFan » Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:00 pm
[quote:17e6701cdf="LMBombers"][quote:17e6701cdf="ggrover15"]i don't know about seattle.. i pick them last time.[/quote:17e6701cdf]
Check out Rob's web page link in the original post. All 24 team choices are spelled out there.
Question about a player. Mike Jackson in the 90's has 3 cards for SEA (a team not in this league) and 2 for SF. Does that mean that he is inelligible for the league or does SF have ownership?[/quote:17e6701cdf]
inelligible
Check out Rob's web page link in the original post. All 24 team choices are spelled out there.
Question about a player. Mike Jackson in the 90's has 3 cards for SEA (a team not in this league) and 2 for SF. Does that mean that he is inelligible for the league or does SF have ownership?[/quote:17e6701cdf]
inelligible
- YountFan
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by LMBombers » Thu Apr 19, 2012 8:20 pm
That was my thought as well but I just wanted to make it clear to everyone.
I was having trouble figuring out who was availabe for the Giants and who was not. You can't just click on SF for each game to really know what you have available. I had to go player by player and then type them into an Excel spreadsheet so I can really see who I have and don't have for each game.
Steve Bedrosian in the 90s game was interesting. He has 2 cards for PHIL and 2 cards for SF. When you add up the IP for those two sets of cards you can see that he is classified a Giant by 2/3 of an inning. Now that is close. :lol:
I was having trouble figuring out who was availabe for the Giants and who was not. You can't just click on SF for each game to really know what you have available. I had to go player by player and then type them into an Excel spreadsheet so I can really see who I have and don't have for each game.
Steve Bedrosian in the 90s game was interesting. He has 2 cards for PHIL and 2 cards for SF. When you add up the IP for those two sets of cards you can see that he is classified a Giant by 2/3 of an inning. Now that is close. :lol:
- LMBombers
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by ROBERTLATORRE » Thu Apr 19, 2012 8:55 pm
[quote:66a648b203="LMBombers"]Also there are several more inelligible cards than the ones marked "no". For example all of the Toronto, Colorado, Florida and Seattle Mariners players since those teams are not ones we will be selecting.[/quote:66a648b203]
Randy is right, I didn't mark NO on franchises that were not eligible, like Mariners and Blue Jays.
Randy is right, I didn't mark NO on franchises that were not eligible, like Mariners and Blue Jays.
- ROBERTLATORRE
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by ROBERTLATORRE » Thu Apr 19, 2012 8:56 pm
[quote:635e5554bf="LMBombers"][quote:635e5554bf="ggrover15"]i don't know about seattle.. i pick them last time.[/quote:635e5554bf]
Check out Rob's web page link in the original post. All 24 team choices are spelled out there.
Question about a player. Mike Jackson in the 90's has 3 cards for SEA (a team not in this league) and 2 for SF. Does that mean that he is inelligible for the league or does SF have ownership?[/quote:635e5554bf]
He is a SEA player based on the 3 cards so he is ineligible.
Check out Rob's web page link in the original post. All 24 team choices are spelled out there.
Question about a player. Mike Jackson in the 90's has 3 cards for SEA (a team not in this league) and 2 for SF. Does that mean that he is inelligible for the league or does SF have ownership?[/quote:635e5554bf]
He is a SEA player based on the 3 cards so he is ineligible.
- ROBERTLATORRE
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
Sorry for the delay
by gmac94 » Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:23 am
Round 1
7 - YountFan - Oakland Athletics
1 - LatorreR - New York Yankees
2 - GGrover - Boston Red Sox
5 - AllStarInc - Cincinnati Reds (via Proxy)
12 - jsam - LA Dodgers
11 - JayHawk - Pittsburgh Pirates
3 - LMBombers - SF Giants
6 - kenhutchings - Atlanta Braves
9 - Yellow_Dog - Baltimore Orioles
4 - Gmac94 - StL Cardinals
8 - sphilipp8
10 - Hakmusic
7 - YountFan - Oakland Athletics
1 - LatorreR - New York Yankees
2 - GGrover - Boston Red Sox
5 - AllStarInc - Cincinnati Reds (via Proxy)
12 - jsam - LA Dodgers
11 - JayHawk - Pittsburgh Pirates
3 - LMBombers - SF Giants
6 - kenhutchings - Atlanta Braves
9 - Yellow_Dog - Baltimore Orioles
4 - Gmac94 - StL Cardinals
8 - sphilipp8
10 - Hakmusic
- gmac94
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball: '70s, '80s, '90s
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest