Sometimes in higher cap leagues I like to use Babe Adams as my rp....I list him in this order, middle, tied, behind, setup, closer and mop up....No other rps listed
The reason I list mop up last is (as explained by Bernie) its least priority.
Sometimes they use Adams a ton, sometimes "not at all."
FYI when I use pure rps this way they "always" get used a ton.
I think the problem, and I do think its a problem, is HAL reading Adams as a top sp first, therefore holding him back from rp usage. Bernie stated as much when I questioned him the first time on this...Now I think HAL overriding my rp instructions just because HAL reads him as a starter is crap and should be fixed.
Now I know I can list my rotation with my 4 sps, excluding Adams, and do, but don't think I should have too.
Still the problem exists...Bernie then responded that having him listed as mop-up even last on the list could be mucking up the works.
So I removed him from mop-up....
Still on opening night with a 3 games needing rps Adams went completely unused.
:x
The response I got from Bernie was troubling to me (I'll print it) and explain why, both on a small scale, (this specific problem) and a larger scale the health of Bernie's job and the future of this game once we are under SOM.
Here's Bernie's explanation...
[quote:e981daa810][b:e981daa810]I’ve told you this quite a few times before: listing the same guy In every Bullpen Role is only asking for trouble.[/b:e981daa810] Here’s the email I sent you 2 months ago on Feb. 23:
“It does work that way in general, but what’s important to keep in mind is that Roles affect usage tendencies beyond just what situation is at hand. As we’ve gone over before, setting someone as a Closer affects whether the computer will use him in other situations (setting Relief Usage to “Maximize” will be stricter; “Normal” will be less strict), and similarly, setting someone as Mop-up (wherever it is in the priority list) will lean towards Mopup usage.”
Specifically, I’ll recommend that you definitely remove Adams from the Mop-up Role because that definitely will mess with his usage. You can TRY to leave him set for the rest of them, but do so at your own risk, considering what I’ve told you. Please keep this in mind.[/quote:e981daa810]
Here's some concerns....First we know that listing the guy in many roles is not asking for trouble...We all seen the posts of rps getting 300+ innings and explanations of this exact or similar set-up as I've described.[b:e981daa810] Bernie doesn't see its more to do with Babe being an sp/rp so instead he forwards inaccurate information [/b:e981daa810]
Mop-up if listed last in order of priority SHOULD HAVE ZERO BEARING ON A BOTTOM OF THE 9TH SAVE SITUATION IF CLOSER IS LISTED HIGHER!!!!!
I should not have to list 4 or 5 other sps in the rotation to get HAL to follow my instructions/settings to use Babe Adams in relief.
So whats the problem Bernie HAL reading him as an sp and holding him back as you first said months ago....OR me listing him at mop-up even though it was his lowest priority...OR just that its asking for trouble to slot him in middle set-up closer roles OR that he's an sp/rp (which is what I think) 3 private messages three different reasons...not satisfactory to me
Bernie is busier now than ever and hopefully many things will work better, smoother or be fixed, but this can't be fixed if Bernie doesn't see it as a problem...I've spent more money here than anyone and my patience is growing thin with poor answers from Bernie....I fear SOM will want a tighter ship run by Bernie and I'm not sure they'll get it, putting Bernie and the game in jeopardy...
This is one of many examples that can be easily fixed, or at least properly explained, but aren't properly addressed...one of many...this one is not why I'd leave, just one of many, that add up to a frustrating gaming experience.