USKL2
by LANCEBOUSLEY » Tue Mar 28, 2006 1:10 pm
ineluki is up...
hawkeye you need to drop reitsma or rhodes, i'll approve.
hawkeye you need to drop reitsma or rhodes, i'll approve.
- LANCEBOUSLEY
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by MICHAELTARBELL » Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:14 am
Just wondering....if Penn's site is "fixed", why can we still not see the cards/prices?? :?
- MICHAELTARBELL
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by blueiguana » Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:09 pm
Doesn't Hawk need to release either Rhodes or Reitsma to cancel his double pick?
- blueiguana
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by kaviksdad » Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:53 pm
There are 2 ways to correct Hawkeye's multiple Round 29 picks - but I'm afraid the easiest way wouldn't actually work.
The draft now has 2 separate pick number 337's - and Hawkeye is shown as selecting both Reitsma and Rhodes. If he were to drop one, I'm afraid his next pick would fill this 337 slot and he'd still get an additional pick in the current round. The best solution, in my opinion, is for him to drop one of the Reitsma/Rhodes picks, then take the cheapest, most worthless player on the board to fill this extra 337 pick that somehow got entered into the draft.
Unless one of the administrators can figure out how to drop the extra pick at position 337. I can't, and am not sure if anyone else can either. In any case, we need to get this straightened out while Ineluki is up so the draft can stay in some sort of balance.
The draft now has 2 separate pick number 337's - and Hawkeye is shown as selecting both Reitsma and Rhodes. If he were to drop one, I'm afraid his next pick would fill this 337 slot and he'd still get an additional pick in the current round. The best solution, in my opinion, is for him to drop one of the Reitsma/Rhodes picks, then take the cheapest, most worthless player on the board to fill this extra 337 pick that somehow got entered into the draft.
Unless one of the administrators can figure out how to drop the extra pick at position 337. I can't, and am not sure if anyone else can either. In any case, we need to get this straightened out while Ineluki is up so the draft can stay in some sort of balance.
- kaviksdad
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by blueiguana » Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:59 pm
How about if Hawk selects the most worthless player with his next pick, and we leave the 337 picks as they are? Reitsma essentially becomes his next pick, then, and no further fiddling is needed.
- blueiguana
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by blueiguana » Wed Mar 29, 2006 1:26 pm
No, it would not be quite fair. But to be fair, we would need to go back and offer Reitsma to everyone after pick 337. I'm figuring that letting Hawk keep Reitsma isn't the greatest injustice ever, and that the interests of efficiency trump justice in this case.
But this may simply be the thinking of a guy who has basically no interest in Chris Reitsma! :)
But this may simply be the thinking of a guy who has basically no interest in Chris Reitsma! :)
- blueiguana
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by nythawk129921 » Wed Mar 29, 2006 1:34 pm
guys sorry for the little "glitch"with that #337 pick.I manually selected Rhodes as I was directed to do yesterday and kept my proxies on.So I will be more than happy to offer up Reitsma to whomever wanted him after my Rhodes pick.Or if need be I will select 2 scrub choices for my last 2 picks and after the draft is concluded I will change out those 2 picks for whoever is still available.Someone let me know what I should do and that is what I will do(though once again it wasnt any fault of my own :oops: )
- nythawk129921
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
Return to Individual League Chat
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests