by Hakmusic » Thu Sep 22, 2005 9:42 am
Sneezedoc, if you took Atlanta, you could keep one of your catchers and one of your SS as backups at those positions in addition to your top 20, and you would still have almost $15 million to use on FA's, which should be plenty to pick up both a catcher and a SS. I don't see a problem for you there.
For Baltimore and Min, there has to be an exception because it is impossible to make the $80 million without one. I certainly don't think it is an advantage to either of them to have the exception.
I think the 20 most expensive is a good rule, and we should stick with it, with the minimal exceptions of where they are completely necessary.
For Minny, if you keep the top 20, and add to get back to 24 minimum roster, you end up $1.5 million over. So it seems to me that you would have to cut a one extra guy from within your top 20 that would make it legel. I don't think it needs to be restrictive, like the lowest player that gets you there, but I also don't think it would be right to cut a guy making, say $4 million or more. should be some one in the $1.5 to mayne $3 million range.
does that seem fair?