No offense taken. And normally, I won't debate "who's better" because it's all so subjective. But in this instance, what the heck....why not?
[quote:0b3dfe19f7]Thank you for re-inforcing my point. How did George Bell do in the playoffs? How did Walker and Helton do those years?[/quote:0b3dfe19f7]
Please. If your whole point is that I should give the award to K-Mac because you made the playoffs and Sean didn't, then you're clearly confused. First of all, that's not the reason I gave it to Bell (like you said, it's not the MVP award, it's the ROY). But even if it was, it's not like Bell played for a last place team. Your Murphs finished ONE WHOLE GAME ahead of the Mango Men. If the Mangos hadn't lost 2 of 3 to the last place Bums on the last day, the roles would've been easily reversed. If making the playoffs is your big argument, then I don't think you have a leg to stand on. The difference in one game does not give McReynolds the edge.
[quote:0b3dfe19f7]Mrs. Bell might not have broke .300 hitting in the Murph. Dont throw the BP crap at me. The loss of singles at the Murph is greater than the loss of HR at Fenway my friend. [/quote:0b3dfe19f7]
:shock: :shock: :shock:
Wait a minute. You really think the loss of SINGLES in the Murph is greater than the loss of HOME RUNS at Fenway?? You do know that you need at the minimum of 4 BP singles to score a single run...and that you need just one BP HR to score a run, right?
And why is it BP "crap" when I use it....but then it's valid when you say that Bell wouldn't hit .300 at the Murph? Can't have it both ways, pal.
Again, no offense taken. I agree that this is all in good fun and should be taken as such. Just a debate between a couple of divisional rivals :)
P.S. - Hey Sean, anytime you feel like jumping in here, feel free. Hate having to defend your guys all the time. Sheesh.