I thought I would start bracket 1 thread since there ain't a team to look at yet.....
First though, one thought.
I think everyone would agree we miss Penn. I hope he didn't part ways in an acrimonious dispute, and what I really hope is that he comes back at someone else and gives to the community as he used to. Me miss ya, Penn. Had you been in these brackets, I would have annointed you as Duke, with your number 1 seeding and 40 playoffs and 10 championship rings (Sorry, Panzer Ace gets the UCLA designation).
So, without further ado, installment 1 of bracketology. **Disclaimer** The analysis following is for amusement purposes only, I do not wish to offend any of the managers in this bracket, or give them locker room material to rile them up when facing my team!!!!!!
Number 1 seed in bracket 1 - Sykes. 26 Playoff appearances, 3 rings.
Sykes has the second most wins as well as second most losses in the 80s. Most people will focus in on his winning percentage and dismiss Sykes since he isn't even at breakeven. That would be a mistake. Sykes is the great experimenter, and has constantly drafted teams to get the odd ball player on his team, and then track how the player preforms. He probably has the most complete data bank on player performance, as he has probably used every player in the set at least once. This is Sykes big moment to prove to the Strat community he is worthy of the overall number 1 seed and go deep into round three or four. School Sykes most accurately represents would be Kansas, lots of playoff appearances, few brass rings.
To conclude this installment, Seed 1, Sykes, most like Univ of Kansas.
Stay tuned as I do this for the remaining 11 seeds, although I will pass on my own team as I don't trust myself to be objective enough about my own strengths and weaknesses.