by cirills » Thu May 04, 2006 8:00 pm
I personally don't care either but get frustrated at hearing others get frustrated at a system that wasn't "mine" to begin with.
Later on, FOWLDAWG said this:[quote:0fe45f49cd]fowldawg
MVP
Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 115
Report abuse Divisional Realignment Procedures 28 Apr 2006 19:25
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
West = A Division
The Division winner stays (no place "up" to go)
Middle two teams stay put
The bottom team in this division moves "down" to B
Central = B Division
The Division winner goes "up" to A
Middle two teams stay
Bottom team goes "down" to C
East = C Division
Division winner goes "up" to B
Middle two teams stay
Bottom teams stay as they con't move down any further
Goal: End up the Top division, stay out of the bottom division
Since we started with random division assignments the A division may not currently have the 4 best teams. Over time this is likely to occur.
[/quote:0fe45f49cd]
So, I'll tell you what.
You guys decide which one you want. I started making picks based on the post above (since it provided me with a different division than I had before) so I won't be happy per say, but whatever. :roll:
What [b:0fe45f49cd]bends ME at of shape[/b:0fe45f49cd] is to get all this feedback the [b:0fe45f49cd]THIRD TIME[/b:0fe45f49cd] I post this. AF raised a question (the only one) after the SECOND time I posted this and that's when FD made the above post -- to which there were NO more responses.
THEN, Qk asks for the divisions, so I post it again and BAM. :roll:
What's the point of that. :cry:
PS And for what it's worth, after the original question to the divisions by FD, I posted a "revised" page (back on like 3 or 4) and have posted it the same 3 times since then. I don't know how much MORE "consistent" I could have been. :oops: