YountFan,
I [b:473faa493d]actually complain more when my team wins[/b:473faa493d] as I often see my SPs getting pulled early in the game. I want my RPs to be used for my non-Clemens, Higgie, and Orel type pitchers. I want them available to toss those two games per series instead of gassing out on 1 inning outings for Clemens' best card.
I want to avoid the liabilities associated with suspected unbalanced cards and not misread / use my $.75m Kipper card when it is his very off year.
I have two dozen or so examples where HAL doesn't pull the starter and the SP completes the game (3 run lead and less) as well as starters who should be pulled and take it on the chin.
In the same series:
[b:473faa493d]Orel pitches 9 innings and takes the loss[/b:473faa493d]
http://members.sportingnews.com/baseball/stratomatic/80s/playoffs/boxscore.html?group_id=12743&g_id=959
[b:473faa493d]Morris pitches 9 innings and takes the loss[/b:473faa493d]
http://members.sportingnews.com/baseball/stratomatic/80s/playoffs/boxscore.html?group_id=12743&g_id=965
[b:473faa493d]Anderson pitches a great 7 innings and almost has the game tossed by Gossage[/b:473faa493d] (who is listed as the closer - conservative settings)
http://members.sportingnews.com/baseball/stratomatic/80s/playoffs/boxscore.html?group_id=12743&g_id=971
While Anderson's relief isn't troublesome, Morris and Orel should have been relieved under Bernie's earlier explanation, right?
My complaint has been and still is - [b:473faa493d]HAL degrades or ignores the pitching strategy settings and the individual settings[/b:473faa493d] when it comes to starters' relief.
IF I have my strategic relief settings established for [b:473faa493d]conservative relief[/b:473faa493d] / [b:473faa493d]regular closer rules[/b:473faa493d], and [b:473faa493d]no set-up man[/b:473faa493d] as well as my individual card settings invoked for [b:473faa493d]slow hook[/b:473faa493d], why can't I expect to see my better starters tossing up 300 innings per season each?
What makes the 80s version harder to handicap is we don't know the cards (some we do). So, I wonder if Fat Fernando's S8 rating is his average POW equivalent and not is standard setting for all the seasons regardless if his actual card had it? In other words, Fat Fernando's bad year might be a S6 and not S8.
What I suspect is TSN's game engine [b:473faa493d]may be[/b:473faa493d] using (among other CD-ROM settings) is "[u:473faa493d]try to control over-usage[/u:473faa493d]" invoked so HAL [b:473faa493d]may[/b:473faa493d] seek to control the amount of playing time a player works. So, HAL is sensistive to usage (innings pitched). While I missed a whole year due to my second Iraq deployment, I wonder if the logic became altered when TSN implemented the RP fatigue function so owners couldn't pitch Eric Gagne for 200 plus innings. :roll:
While you can get McGwire or Mitchell to hit 70 plus HRs on their better cards and in the right park, we rarely see Clemens' best card completing 30 games per season. Heck, I have had a few top $$$ 80s SPs' best card in a pitching park and didn't have more than 10 or so complete games.
Under normal or typical settings, HAL makes his relief judgements as we've all know, e.g., established set-up and closer are implemented (presuming not fatigued) when the starter is "fatigued" and reaches the appropriate inning.
However, I want to retard those "switches" and rely on my starters to pitch like in the deadball era especially when I invest in Clemens' and Orel's cards in Dodger or the Astrodome.
If I can't use the switches on the manager strategy and individual settins to get more innings out of my starters, what is to think I can limit their exposure by invoking more aggressive relief settings?
Oddly, I've noticed the likes of Eck and a few other relievers tossing 4 inning outings and pitching another 2 inning outing in the same series.
If I can't get Orel to pitch one more inning above his S8 rating when he hasn't been touched with a bat, how can I accept Eck tossing 6 innings in one series?
Something has to be wrong, right?