by MARCPELLETIER » Mon May 08, 2006 2:33 pm
[quote:0da38e0aeb]You can't pick it one way or the other. You need to have some balance[/quote:0da38e0aeb]
I disagree with this statement. If you go with Kaufmann, I believe that you should have one slugger max, perhaps two max. But you should not go for "balance"; you should go for an all-out on-base team. My 105-57 team which I posted the link above had Bonds, but he was the only slugger. I finished 10th in slugging, but 1st in on-base, and finished close to the top for runs scored. I replicated these stats with the 88-74 team (actually, was 9th for slugging and 1st for on-base). This last team was actually 11th for ISO (isolated power, the real stat we should be looking for when we talk of slugging).
If you go with Coors, or with a neutral stadium, then yes I agree, you need some balance.
The reason you should be looking for on-base in Coors is because you have to take full advantage of the numerous homeruns that you will be hitting. You have to create an environment where you will hit many multi-runs homeruns. Another reason is, when calculating the linear weights of outs, one can find out that outs cost the most in Coors. Of course, Coors also have high ballpark ratings for homeruns. Hence, offensively, you should be looking for high-onbase, high slugging cards.
If I am right, then you should be looking for on-base in Kauffman and in Coors, whereas you should look for slugging in Coors but not in Kauffman. This is one reason why I agree with the statement that on-base is more important than slugging.