Bonds 2006

[wavygravy2k]

Do you think Bonds will make the cut for SOM Online 2006? His season is now over.


[code:1:0e8cb96a3b]
Year G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS OBP SLG OPS AVG
2005 14 42 8 12 1 0 5 10 9 6 0 0 .404 .667 1.071 .286
[/code:1:0e8cb96a3b]

[wavygravy2k]

dang it! The "Code" in the preview looked fine but its reformated because the Author column is to wide! I'm not used to this forum.

[code:1:147f1bfcde]Year G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS OBP SLG OPS AVG
2005 14 42 8 12 1 0 5 10 9 6 0 0 .404 .667 1.071 .286[/code:1:147f1bfcde]

[Play By The Rules]

No.

[The Biomechanical Man]

Today I was thinking about the same question (card or no card), and decided on the same answer (no card). :P

[korkie]

No way he gets a card.....

[hechojazz]

42 ABs does not a card make...

[DOUGGRAY]

Its actually a decision TSN will make. His SOM card will exist and it will have an injury on a 7. TSN makes judgement calls on including cards.

Why not include the card? it is not abnormal to Bonds performance over many years so let it exist.

[DOUGGRAY]

oh btw, I will have my opinion stuck in TSN's brain over this for a long time ;)

[tersignf]

leave him, his roids, his non-bargaining idiocy so we can't call him "Bonds", and his card...out of TSN!

[TomSiebert]

Frankly, his numbers are pretty similar to his numbers in years past, so if you put the injury on 7 -- or maybe TWO injury rolls on his card??? -- I don't see why not.

But extenuating circumstances -- steroids and his selfish stand-alone baseball brand that won't allow SoM to use his name -- make me think he doesn't really deserve to have a card if the decision is on the fence.

tws