by cirills » Thu Jun 22, 2006 11:40 am
From what I can see on the Transaction List, it only appears to be moves just like the ones you have described.
However, I do think that team depth gives everyone the right to remove a player that is stinking up the joint for new blood. Wasn't that what the Haren/Small move/s you made were for KD? Or the Rincon/Flores move I made?
And remember, that after Game 141 there will be no more transactions allowed so there can be no playing starts or anything like that coming down the playoff stretch.
I have not seen any indication of "abuse" of any kind with these type of transactions at all, but if there was someone that thought that they could make rampant moves to their benefit I don't know that I would oppose them. I don't necessarily see the absloute success of such a method but then again, maybe that is why I seem to suck in SOM. :(
I just don't want to discourage anyone from making moves that they think can help their team as I thought that was the main principle behind having a 40 man roster. While I do realize, that in the ML they do have a waiver system in play -- there are quite of few unlimited moves allowed at the outset, and as much as I like recordkeeping and all, I don't think I would like to keep track of all the roster moves that are made as well.
That all said, if there seemed to be an overwhelming majority that would favor some kind of gentelmen's agreement that could be written in a very comprehensive way I would not oppose it being put to a vote, but the one that D-T just wrote above is very vague in my opinion (esp. A), and open to a lot of interpretation (something I think is inherent when there is no hard/fast rule).
Also, not that this is a just defense, but being that half of us also are in Qk's league where there ARE unlimited roster moves allowed, I would prefer to keep as many things similar (whithin reason) as possible to avoid possible confusion. However, as FD poined out to me last night -- there is a third league in existence -- The USKL2 -- and even though I was in that one at the outset, I am not anymore and realize there are probably differences there (and that there are quite a few of you in that one as well).
Oy vay ... :?
My intention above, was to once and for all list a concrete, black and white set of rules that would eliminate all the gray areas that have afflicted us once and for all, not open up more confusion or controversy.
<sigh>