Boggs or Schmidt or Relief or Other?

Boggs or Schmidt or Relief or Other?

Postby sgehanesq » Fri Jul 07, 2006 11:01 am

http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/baseball/stratomatic/atg2/team/team_other.html?user_id=114303

I have never been a big fan of Mike Schmidt becuase of his cost and lack of balance, but his D is much better than Boggs - and would be a good compliment to Oz and Morgan in the infield. Anyway, I'd appreciate any tips for what to do with my $3.5 million for this bomber team playing in Sportsman's '34.
sgehanesq
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby ADRIANGABRIEL » Fri Jul 07, 2006 11:31 am

I'm guessing this is a DH league? In that case, you have one OF too many. Oakland #24 would be a very nice addition, though. And I think Schmidt works better than Boggs. Haller's OK, but I prefer Dickey as a better value on offense with better D.

You also have one SP too many. I would cut Miller, Heintzelman, or, maybe, Merritt for another reliever or 2. Given what's available, I'd say Klippstein or Baumgartner. Hughes, Russell or Morgan would be nice compliments as well.
ADRIANGABRIEL
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby sgehanesq » Fri Jul 07, 2006 11:55 am

Thanks. I forgot to mention it is a $100 mil, DH league.

Funny you mentioned Oakland #24, because he is the number one free agent. If I release Russo - and just give up on the idea of pitching - I could trade Valentin up for Ricky, and add Schiraldi and New York #47 to the bullpen, while also trading Boggs for Schmidt.

That leaves $1.29 for another starter or reliever, which could come from among your suggestions. I guess that begs the question of whether folks think it is more important to have a solid starter or a solid relief corps. (the division is equally split between deathly pitchers parks (Dunn '20 and Royals '80) and to hitters parks (Sportsmans '34 and Fenway '67). There is really no offense left in the FA pool.

As to the carrying of an extra outfielder, my concern with this crew has been injuries, and having a decent back up, plus Covington/Ellis gives me a premium DH platoon. The extra pitcher is to be able to use a lefty or righty in the five spot to take advatnage of specific situations.

Thoughts?
sgehanesq
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby BassballJG » Fri Jul 07, 2006 12:38 pm

[quote:dfce7f46af="sgehanesq"]Thanks. I forgot to mention it is a $100 mil, DH league.

Funny you mentioned Oakland #24, because he is the number one free agent. If I release Russo - and just give up on the idea of pitching - I could trade Valentin up for Ricky, and add Schiraldi and New York #47 to the bullpen, while also trading Boggs for Schmidt.

That leaves $1.29 for another starter or reliever, which could come from among your suggestions. I guess that begs the question of whether folks think it is more important to have a solid starter or a solid relief corps. (the division is equally split between deathly pitchers parks (Dunn '20 and Royals '80) and to hitters parks (Sportsmans '34 and Fenway '67). There is really no offense left in the FA pool.

As to the carrying of an extra outfielder, my concern with this crew has been injuries, and having a decent back up, plus Covington/Ellis gives me a premium DH platoon. The extra pitcher is to be able to use a lefty or righty in the five spot to take advatnage of specific situations.

Thoughts?[/quote:dfce7f46af]

Dude, we need to talk...
BassballJG
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby ADRIANGABRIEL » Fri Jul 07, 2006 1:06 pm

Valentine OR Covington could be your DH, not both. That's total overkill.

As far as injuries go, ignore them! Yes, there will be injuries, but they are not necessarily a given. I've seen Honus Wagner play 160 games. I've seen Tris Speaker go down 9 separate times in a season. Having a $5-6M backup is only feasible in a $200M league.

You're going to play a majority of games in a hitter's park. Hitter's park = more starter fatigue = more bullpen usage = you need a strong pen. I WANT to get to my pen in a hitter's park as they are often better than my starters. Get through 5 or 6 solid innings and leave the rest to better arms in the pen.
ADRIANGABRIEL
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby ADRIANGABRIEL » Fri Jul 07, 2006 1:35 pm

fwiw, here's what I would do:

Dump Russo, Gomez, Leever, Merritt, Heintzelman, Miller, and Dayley
Pick up Derringer, Root, Malone, Holtzman, Russell, Baumgartner, McDowell, and a .50 SP/RP

Dump Haller, Boggs, McCosky, and Furillo
Pick up Dickey, Schmidt, and Henderson
ADRIANGABRIEL
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby sgehanesq » Fri Jul 07, 2006 10:09 pm

I took your advice, to the tee. It was tough, but who am I to argue with such an esteemed All-Star? No one. So, feel free to check in on the team and see how we do.

Thanks for taking the time to figure it out in such detail! :D
sgehanesq
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby Free Radicals » Fri Jul 07, 2006 10:37 pm

Only one thing gets to me here . You put such stock on D and have a 2e15 at 1B . Can you do better there?
Free Radicals
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby ADRIANGABRIEL » Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:23 am

I take no responsibility if this team falters. That's just due to the vagaries of random variation. However, if this team does well, I take full credit. :mrgreen:

With .66 left, you can play around a little with your backups. The obvious place would be in your backup catcher--Kluttz, Z. Taylor, or Burns, perhaps.

And I wouldn't worry about York's D. There are no free agents availabe that you'd want over him anyway.
ADRIANGABRIEL
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby sgehanesq » Mon Jul 10, 2006 9:18 pm

You can have all due credit. :D Hey, I didn't have to take the suggestions, so I can accept the vagarities of the game.

Hey, what do you think about Ozzie, Morgan, Ricky, and Covington against righties? I originally had the Wiz in the 9 spot, but this is a pretty right-handed heavy power line-up, and those three leading off should get on plenty. It may be a bit unorthodox, but I think it might work.

As for York, I can swallow a poor glove at first. Fact is, agabriel is right, there is no better, and at least he is a two. His bat should more than cover any errors. He has always been good for 110-130 RBIs for me, and I've used him a lot.
sgehanesq
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm


Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball: All-Time Greats

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests

cron