ATG II Theme League - No Pure Relievers - Chat/Draft Thread

[dacelo]

Will do - I always like to check. Thanks.


I always assumed putting them at the bottom was a "trust" thing. Putting them at the top would ensure that no preselected players were drafted because there would (should) be no conflicts. Putting them at the bottom guarentees that no one slips in a FA before preselected men were picked up.

[rosenthm]

Six teams entered, six to go...interesting selection of ballparks, about even hitter's and pitcher's parks

[dacelo]

Hey, I just had a Stra-O-Piphany. Bull, you are absolutely right - putting drafted players at the bottom avoids conflicts as well as at the top. Sometimes it takes a while for my :idea: to come on. Usually right after reading it in a post. :)

[Frank Bailey]

The Central is full.

[Simon31]

14th or 15th, doesn't matter to me. I'm flexible on the time and date right now.

[YountFan]

Hard to say the league has a balance of BP when all I see are Bakers and Sportmen's my Forbes team feels underpowered. Why did I pick Forbes again? Note to self...go with your strengths

[rosenthm]

At the time I made the comment about balance, there were 2 Bakers and a Briggs vs a Dodger 65, a Forbes and a Dunn....since that point, the Sportsmans and Buschs have swung the balance to hitters parks...still interesting that Sportsman Parks and Busch 64 have duplicates....wonder what the last one will be?

[YountFan]

[quote:de84b28e96="rosenthm"]....wonder what the last one will be?[/quote:de84b28e96] I hope it is a place my smallballers can win.

[rosenthm]

Who's #12?

[YountFan]

[b:710da65abc]None other than AT himself. [/b:710da65abc]

I know he likes to close out leagues, but I want to see how bad I got toasted in the AD