by bjs73 » Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:31 pm
[b:23a07af0e9]Iceman said:[/b:23a07af0e9]
[quote:23a07af0e9]The only way to keep the league going is a process which enables the weaker teams to strengthen in the off season as well as trading hot players during the playoff runs...but it also seems like few teams try to strengthen themselves when they are in a race.[/quote:23a07af0e9]
In my mind's eye, the mystery card in the 80's game addresses this issue quite well. A keeper league in the 80's game presents all kinds of possiblities season after season. I had career years out of Mike Scott, Don Sutton, and Tartabull. It wasn't like that in season 1. In fact, I had to drop Scott and Sutton to free up cap room to make other improvements.
I finished at .500 in season 1 and had a good run in season 2. Who knows what's in store for me in season 3?
[b:23a07af0e9]On trading:[/b:23a07af0e9]
In season 1, I tried to trade Mike Scott for Wade Boggs but it was not meant to be. In season 2, I ended up trading for Cal Ripken after attempting to come to a deal for Robin Yount. As far as trades go for me, that's par for the course.
I'm open to offers but I'm not going to trade for the sake of trading. I'm pretty comfortable with the players that I have and the backup plans for those seasons in which I may get a bad card. In season 1, I tried to sell since I felt that I was out of the race but in season 2, I didn't feel that a trade was necessary for the playoff run. Who knows what the future holds though?
[b:23a07af0e9]On the logistics of a supplemental draft:[/b:23a07af0e9]
Firstly, I'm not in favor of cutting the rosters and redrafting for the reason that I stated above: the mystery card factor. I think that the inaugural snake draft provided for some decent parity and you can always trade into other deals.
However, if parity is truly broken then I would be willing to visit a supplemental type draft. (Protect 40-45 guys and redraft the unprotected.) My problem with this is that it screws people who have traded into larger rosters (like UglyJerry) and I wouldn't want that.
The other problem is handling the logistics of such a draft. I don't know if we could use Penn's site to handle the supplemental draft player pool or not? But we're easily talking about a 160+ player pool here. We would probably have to do it on the boards, I think?
And it will be mostly comprised of the Gary Reduses, Dave Martinezes, and Joe Orsulaks of the player pool. Is it worth all of that?
[b:23a07af0e9]Other forms of league parity already in place:[/b:23a07af0e9]
I believe that the way we arrange the brackets after each season creates a good parity for the league as is. The bottom 4 teams from season 2 will be in the west together which means that there will be at least one playoff team that makes it that didn't before.
And all of the playoff teams are together in the east which means at least 2 of those teams won't be back in the playoffs for season 3.