mrharryc wrote:I'm fine with Barnes as a Brave. Since Baseball reference is our standard, we should follow the listings on these 19th century players... listed with Braves, belongs to Braves, listed with Pirates, belongs to Pirates et al.
This seems reasonable. If Baseball Reference has a pre-1900 player associated with a particular franchise, then he will belong to that franchise. If there is no such reference, that player is available for drafting by any Manager. Again, this does not include the NEL league.
JoeyC