Thu Apr 23, 2020 10:45 pm
I'm editing and reorganizing the rules so that they are more clear. There are two outstanding rule issues that need to be settled eventually: (1) penalties for violating the salary cap, and (2) free agent bidding. I'd like to propose a new rule for salary cap violations. First let me say that the only way a team can exceed the salary cap is if they lose an arbitration. The rules prohibit a team from placing a bid on a free agent that would put them over the salary cap, and trade rules prevent teams from engaging in trades that force a team to exceed the cap, so the only way to exceed the cap is due to an unfavorable arbitration ruling. I therefore propose the following rule change:
Salary Cap Violation Rule: If a team exceeds the salary cap as the result of an unfavorable arbitration decision, the player whose arbitration decision caused the team to go over the cap is considered to be banned for the season for violations of league substance abuse policies. If more than one player is involved in the arbitration process that resulted in the salary cap violation, the team must get under the salary cap by identifying as few arbitration players as possible to get back into compliance. Each of those "Balco" players will be considered banned for the season. Banned players will remain on the team roster, but the team will not be permitted to participate in free agent signing periods or the prospect draft until they get back under the salary cap.
For example, Team A has spent $130 million in salary cap space before arbitration with three players up for arbitration this year. In a stroke of bad luck these three players are awarded $10 mil, $6 mil, and $4 mil. The team would be required to suspend the $10 mil player for the season as this would involve the suspension of the fewest number of players required to bring the team back into compliance with the salary cap.
Please provide comments and suggestions before I formally propose the rule change for a vote.
Phil