Jeepdriver wrote:No, whomever drafted him can use him as a Pitcher or Hitter but he can't be used by two different Owners.
Well, he drafted him as a hitter so that's how he has to use him.
We did talk about one manager not being to use him in both roles, but is there a problem if someone drafts him as a pitcher? Not sure why we would preclude this from happening.
If the Owner is using him as a Hitter wants to change and use him as a Pitcher, then he has to incur the droppage penalty to do that. Personally I see no reason to mandate that he be used one way or the other. JMO
Jeepdriver wrote:If the Owner is using him as a Hitter wants to change and use him as a Pitcher, then he has to incur the droppage penalty to do that. Personally I see no reason to mandate that he be used one way or the other. JMO
Well, because there are salariy differences and positional differences. He's really two players with the same name. I think he should be treated as two players.
Jeepdriver wrote:If the Owner is using him as a Hitter wants to change and use him as a Pitcher, then he has to incur the droppage penalty to do that. Personally I see no reason to mandate that he be used one way or the other. JMO
I never realized he had two different price structures -