- Posts: 14720
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:42 pm
andycummings65 wrote:Two ways to handle it--I've seen both used.
One says whatever grouping they are with is who they belong to--in other words the grouping they are in is what matters.
The other way, what I believe you are saying you want us to do,is if they are carded to the twins they belong to the twins even if the grouping is Washington.
Andy, What do you suggest? I don't want to combine the Senators and Twins now that the draft is under way. To me it seems better to go with what the card says. However, you have far more experience with these themed leagues. Do you suggest going with the lists?? My problem as commish is that I don't have time to police what grouping the player is in, however, it is easy for me to decide if a player belongs on a certain owners team when I see that owner A owns the Twins and the version of Kaat he has says TWINS on the card, instead of doing a filtered search to see which franchise SOM decided to pidgeon hole him under....smell what I'm cookin??
To be honest I'm easy, I can be convinced to go either way, but please consider my position of what is easiest to police to make sure an owner isn't pulling a fast one either. Feel free to call me also if you want to discuss, this banter back and forth could take hours to iron out in order for you to make your pick.