NAKL Chat

Moderator: Palmtana

  • Author
  • Message
Offline

lakeviewdave

  • Posts: 8572
  • Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:56 pm
  • Location: Wake Forest, NC

Re: NAKL Chat

PostMon Jun 26, 2023 3:33 pm

Muck wrote:
schnoogens wrote:The trades involving McCormick need to stand and he is officialy on Niners' roster.

My mistake on missing the movement and mistakenly showing him on Muck's roster.

For sure Muck can immediately make an additional Spring Pick to get his roster to 40.

Gunnar Henderson and Brendan Donovan are comparables in terms of 2022 salary and Donovan is a similar age to McCormick (chosen 11th) while Henderson is 21 and went 2nd overall.

I could justify providing Muck a 2024 a supplemental Spring Pick between rounds 1 and 2, or between rounds 2 and 3. What are people's thoughts? Just want to right the wrong and get things into an acceptable position all around.



Just wanted to revisit and get resolution now that Season 1 is over.


Extra FA pick at end of Round 1, I would not be in favor of, either at end of Round 3, possibly 2 seems more reasonable to me. McCormick is not on same class as G.Henderson, a highly regarded prospect. McCormick is not a good comparable, IMO.

What about a additional pick supplemental pick after 1st round of upcoming supplemental draft?
Offline

schnoogens

  • Posts: 744
  • Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 7:59 am

Re: NAKL Chat

PostTue Jun 27, 2023 11:52 am

We can put it to a vote. "A" is Muck gets a supplemental pick between rounds 2 and 3 next spring. "B" is Muck gets a supplemental mid-season pick this year between rounds 1 and 2. FWIW, I view these as relatively equal with a bit more risk (but more upside) on the mid-season supplemental pick.

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

Majority goes through and then we'll move on.
Offline

Ninersphan

  • Posts: 11543
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:30 pm
  • Location: Near Roanoke VA

Re: NAKL Chat

PostTue Jun 27, 2023 12:15 pm

I vote with majority as these choices are so similar. In fact, IMHO the commissioner should just pick one so we can be done with it and get on with season two.
Online

Roscodog

  • Posts: 7522
  • Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 12:23 pm

Re: NAKL Chat

PostTue Jun 27, 2023 12:15 pm

We can put it to a vote. "A" is Muck gets a supplemental pick between rounds 2 and 3 next spring. "B" is Muck gets a supplemental mid-season pick this year between rounds 1 and 2. FWIW, I view these as relatively equal with a bit more risk (but more upside) on the mid-season supplemental pick.

1. Rosco B
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

Majority goes through and then we'll move on.
Offline

Jerlins

  • Posts: 2007
  • Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:41 pm

Re: NAKL Chat

PostTue Jun 27, 2023 5:04 pm

We can put it to a vote. "A" is Muck gets a supplemental pick between rounds 2 and 3 next spring. "B" is Muck gets a supplemental mid-season pick this year between rounds 1 and 2. FWIW, I view these as relatively equal with a bit more risk (but more upside) on the mid-season supplemental pick.

1. Rosco B
2. Jerlins-B (prefer to let Muck decide since they are basically similar)
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

Majority goes through and then we'll move on.
Offline

Muck

  • Posts: 280
  • Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2022 5:02 pm

Re: NAKL Chat

PostTue Jun 27, 2023 9:11 pm

Jerlins wrote:We can put it to a vote. "A" is Muck gets a supplemental pick between rounds 2 and 3 next spring. "B" is Muck gets a supplemental mid-season pick this year between rounds 1 and 2. FWIW, I view these as relatively equal with a bit more risk (but more upside) on the mid-season supplemental pick.

1. Rosco B
2. Jerlins-B (prefer to let Muck decide since they are basically similar)
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

Majority goes through and then we'll move on.



Not sure I get a vote but I actually think B is the most fair. To me the FA draft pick is a little too valuable for this situation, so I’m good with B unless anyone objects
Offline

schnoogens

  • Posts: 744
  • Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 7:59 am

Re: NAKL Chat

PostWed Jun 28, 2023 9:16 am

Alright, let's scrap the vote and go with "B". This has the added advantage of being resolved now vs being pushed into the future.

I'll start a cuts/supplemental thread. I'll also get a fresh roster out before we begin.
Offline

schnoogens

  • Posts: 744
  • Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 7:59 am

Re: NAKL Chat

PostThu Jun 29, 2023 9:32 am

We had 3 teams with 81 wins. Tiebreaker is H2H record, so in this case I accumulated the H2H record between all 3 teams.

Muck: 14-10
Lakeviewdave: 19-17
Nythawk: 15-21

This means that Muck's team finished "higher" than the other two in terms of overall standings. Therefore the order in the Supplemental Draft for these three:

Nythawk
LVD
Muck

Divisions will be:
East: Aray, MLBPhan, MFL, Rosco
Central: Schnoogens, Muck, Lakeviewdave, Nythawk
West: KLX22, WJS, Ninersphan, Jerlins
Offline

lakeviewdave

  • Posts: 8572
  • Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:56 pm
  • Location: Wake Forest, NC

Re: NAKL Chat

PostFri Jun 30, 2023 8:28 pm

Players available to move, looking for FA/Pros picks primarily or players

Willson Contreras C
Rafael Montero RP/Closer
Miguel Vargas IF
Andrew Vaughn 1B
Elijah Green (prospect)

Others that could be dealt with right offer
Julio Urias SP
Adam Duvall CF/RF
Vaughn Grissom IF
Carlos Correa SS
Jose Altuve 2B
Offline

Jerlins

  • Posts: 2007
  • Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:41 pm

Re: NAKL Chat

PostSat Jul 01, 2023 1:17 pm

Due to a previous error regarding a trade, MFL sends his 2024 to Jerlins. This is a revised option which originally was a 2023 1st Rd supplemental pick. MFL536 to confirm
PreviousNext

Return to Individual League Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: boobarne, max_fischer, mysapo45, nythawk129921, Roscodog, toshiro and 32 guests