Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:15 pm
I like the two-division idea a lot, although I'd go one step farther and limit the post season to the two division winners. After all, we don't get extra TV money from more playoff games, so why not get this back to the way things used to be - I'd even be good with no inter-division play in a 16-team league.
I'm ambivalent about limiting players to their historical at-bats or innings-pitched. The difficulty for me is that we're not re-creating the original seasons, and we don't have the same rosters, so we could very well get stuck without enough at-bats or innings-pitched on the roster to complete the season. It just seems like it would turn the game into more of a job. I can see the desire, but I don't think that level of realism is what I'd enjoy.
As for the 40 man roster, yes, definitely. It would make the use of more injury-prone guys viable, at least once in a while. For keeper leagues I could see how it would improve options for making trades, too. I'm sure it would need some fine-tuning so that people wouldn't abuse it, but it seems like having a specific limit on options to the "minors" would work just as well as it does in the real world. That's my two cents anyway.