Strat-O-Matic Baseball 365

Is this true about catchers? I can't find it documented anywhere. Does that mean you are better off not having a third catcher that is worse than the second because then you can have 2 injured catchers and forced to use the third?

sebtay41 wrote:Is this true about catchers? I can't find it documented anywhere. Does that mean you are better off not having a third catcher that is worse than the second because then you can have 2 injured catchers and forced to use the third?

Weird. I can't find current documentation on this. However, it's always been your second catcher can't get injured if your other catcher is injured.

The rolls/ injuries are as random as the ridiculous conspiracy theories people are putting forth. Of course injuries are random, why would they not be?