Avoiding Double Plays
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 3:57 am
In 60's Mystery League I believe I have Jim Davenport on his '62 season.....297, .357, .456 and productive vs both RHP and LHP. The problem with the card is he has a slew of gbA's in column 2 from 4-8 plus one more at the 12.
Does anyone have a thought on how to avoid him hitting into an extreme amount of DP's? He has an "A" bunt rating and "C" H&R rating.
I've considered possibly batting him lead off, that way, at the very least, he will have 1 AB with no one on first. It's also a non DH league, so in many instances, the previous batter will not be on base. The down side of that is I have other players on better years that the AB's would probably be more warranted to go to.
I've thought about hitting him behind Maury Wills who has an "AAA" SB rating and putting wills on steal more. But from my experience, even the good base stealers in Strat get caught at an alarming rate even vs bad catchers.
I'm leaning towards batting him down lower in the order and checking the "bunt more" box in hitter preferences. I figure the one out is much less damaging than the 2 and he'll have opportunities in other situations to take advantage of his relatively productive card.
Any thoughts would be appreciated!
Does anyone have a thought on how to avoid him hitting into an extreme amount of DP's? He has an "A" bunt rating and "C" H&R rating.
I've considered possibly batting him lead off, that way, at the very least, he will have 1 AB with no one on first. It's also a non DH league, so in many instances, the previous batter will not be on base. The down side of that is I have other players on better years that the AB's would probably be more warranted to go to.
I've thought about hitting him behind Maury Wills who has an "AAA" SB rating and putting wills on steal more. But from my experience, even the good base stealers in Strat get caught at an alarming rate even vs bad catchers.
I'm leaning towards batting him down lower in the order and checking the "bunt more" box in hitter preferences. I figure the one out is much less damaging than the 2 and he'll have opportunities in other situations to take advantage of his relatively productive card.
Any thoughts would be appreciated!