Strat-O-Matic Baseball 365

Wondering if consideration should be given to a minimum team salary? Or some kind of oversight when a team appears to be skewing the tourney results with excessive drops, resulting in teams with salaries in the $52 million range.

I think it depends on whether the team is trying to lose. So far, in the 2000s, I've cut 40 players attempting to get a better team. As long as the team is not intentionally tanking I think it is a fair part of the game.

I thought there was a default minimum that was applied - I thought it was 60 - didn't think you could go down to 52. If you can point me to some examples that would help. I know I went down to 65 million roster value myself in the 70s in a desperate attempt to find anyone who could pitch.

Hi folks, thanks to all who have brought this to my attention. I have reached out to some of the people using this questionable strategy to assess and see how I can help. I wish I was aware of this sooner, but better late than never.