STEVE F wrote:At the risk of being "captain obvious" , wouldn't all cards nominated in the last add that didn't make it be a good place to start?
The key word here is "start", because if it's just voting for what was left over last time, then no thanks. Sure, put the list up for voting along with some of the other ideas that have been floated about -- including a big bashing Bonds year and some of the newer players along with Banks, Mays and Musial. I know some of the ambassadors have problems with the newer guys (and the VERY old guys), but at least let us vote them up or down. It would be nice if the list presented to us for voting respected the 3 to 2 ratio that our teams need to maintain (15 position players and 10 pitchers).
Bill