I've always been impressed that pre-1960s cards get voted in at all, considering all we have to evaluate them is mostly Andy's "Informed Choices" numbers. Kudos to the community for fighting off recency bias in this regard.
Similarly, voters are walking away from a strong sentimental favorite -- Ernie Banks. The argument that Mr. Cub lacks a card where he can play his career-primary position, 1B, is compelling. But, unfortunately, it just isn't enough to carry a really pretty mediocre card. Ernie will get in as a first baseman if and when SOM adds the entire '69 team, Jimmy Qualls, Willie Smith, and everyone else. Which they should do.
Buck Ewing is a bigger deal than you might think. He was considered the greatest catcher of all-time 100 years ago. This post gives more insight:
https://forum-365.strat-o-matic.com/com ... 176aa12d92. It will be an exciting new card, unlike any other.
Would still love to have a round of voting restricted to hitters with fewer than 300 PA and SP with fewer than 200 innings. Or, if the concern is too great that this would just add too many more Mike Blowers-type platoon gods to the set, maybe we could vote in entire teams of players, such as the '69 Cubs or the 1914 "Miracle Braves."
Finally, although he is named last on the ballot, please don't ignore LHSP
Doug Rau, arsenic to right-handed hitters and a foil for your opponent's cheap Mariano, Jordy, and Wock platoon strategy. You'll be Rau-warded for your vote.