- Posts: 1975
- Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:55 pm
Below is my analysis of our adds across three dimensions and two timelines.
The last grouping excludes the 2008 TB Rays, I wanted the % of the individual cards added. Also don't try and add the %'s up in the BY POSITION matrix (that means you Bill), because they won't. I included any listed position for everyone but CF, SS or 2B figuring we'd play a guy with a 4 at 3B, 1B, LF and RF but wouldn't at CF, SS or 2B.
Initial take:
1. We are doing pretty damn good at focusing on players with zero or one card in ATG
2. We should consider a positional add of 3B, SS, CF and C
3. Older should be the new Newer, we have been heavy on the more recent players
BY POSITION/ALL ADDS/% OF 200/LAST 4 ADDS/% of 125
1B 33 17% 17 14%
2B 20 10% 14 11%
3B 14 7% 9 7%
SS 9 5% 6 5%
CF 13 7% 7 6%
LFRF 50 25% 32 26%
C 9 5% 7 6%
SP 44 22% 26 21%
RP 31 16% 25 20%
PURE RP 26 13% 22 18%
BY PREV CARDS/% of 200/LAST 4 ADDS/% of 125
0 111 56% 79 63%
1 41 21% 18 14%
2 31 16% 15 12%
3 15 8% 12 10%
4 2 1% 1 1%
BY DECADE/% of 175/LAST 4 ADDS/% of 100
PRE 1900 2 1% 0 0%
1900-09 3 2% 3 3%
1910-19 3 2% 2 2%
1920-29 11 6% 7 7%
1930-39 4 2% 2 2%
1940-49 4 2% 2 2%
1950-59 15 9% 9 9%
1960-69 11 6% 9 9%
1970-79 18 10% 9 9%
1980-89 12 7% 6 6%
1990-99 23 13% 13 13%
2000-09 45 26% 30 30%
2010+ 24 14% 8 8%
As always, open to others interpretation of the data.
Tks
Rosie