Page 1 of 1

ATG Card Poll 1 of 2

PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 9:40 pm
by Rosie2167
This is poll 1 of 2 to help identify where we as a community should focus the nominations for this upcoming ATG Card add.

Re: ATG Card Poll 1 of 2

PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:21 pm
by bontomn
I can't truthfully answer the question the way it's phrased. It's important to add cards of unrepresented players, but to me it's equally important to help the seldom-ever-chosen franchises by upgrading players who now have only seriously unworthy cards, usually only one. I think it would be wasted effort to have Strat add extra seasons for players who already have three or more cards.

Re: ATG Card Poll 1 of 2

PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:29 pm
by Rosie2167
bontomn wrote:I can't truthfully answer the question the way it's phrased. It's important to add cards of unrepresented players, but to me it's equally important to help the seldom-ever-chosen franchises by upgrading players who now have only seriously unworthy cards, usually only one. I think it would be wasted effort to have Strat add extra seasons for players who already have three or more cards.

Added another option, hopefully that addresses the concern.

tks
Rosie

Re: ATG Card Poll 1 of 2

PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:47 pm
by The Last Druid
Don't like this poll. Most have multiple priorities I suspect. I want both players who are not in the set and players with cards that don't reflect anything close to their best years and players that will meet franchise needs. I also want some guys with great seasons like Bonds' .370 year. With 50 cards we can have a bit of everything. We already have a format for the cards, eras and teams. Why complicate it, particularly by setting up false dichotomies as in the way this poll is worded.

Re: ATG Card Poll 1 of 2

PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 11:55 pm
by Salty
The Last Druid wrote:Don't like this poll. Most have multiple priorities I suspect. I want both players who are not in the set and players with cards that don't reflect anything close to their best years and players that will meet franchise needs. I also want some guys with great seasons like Bonds' .370 year. With 50 cards we can have a bit of everything. We already have a format for the cards, eras and teams. Why complicate it, particularly by setting up false dichotomies as in the way this poll is worded.


yup