Page 1 of 4

Reds Additions

PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 2:32 pm
by andycummings65
1978 Dave Concepcion - the man played SS forever for Reds; can we not have at least one card that isn't an INJ risk?

1965 Leo Cardenas

2004 Adam Dunn

1902 Noodles Hahn - better card, Reds db SP weak

1995 Reggie Sanders - no card in ATG

1988 Danny Jackson

1986 Rob Murphy

Re: Reds Additions

PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 5:02 pm
by STEVE F
1954 Ted Kluszewski

Re: Reds Additions

PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 5:09 pm
by andycummings65
Klu also on larger streamlined list from Bill's list

Re: Reds Additions

PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 5:43 pm
by Rosie2167
Haven't looked over the pitchers yet but hitters...
Joey Votto - 2010, no card in ATG
Cy Seymour - 1905, this year quite a bit better than his 1 in ATG
Adam Dunn - 2004, no card
Reggie Sanders - 1995, no card

Klu's 54 is better but he has 3 cards already, one of which isn't that far behind '54.

Re: Reds Additions

PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 6:16 pm
by Rosie2167
Pitchers

Agree with Hahn '02
Ted Abernathy '67 should be considered, his best year .978 whip
I like Rob Murphy too but would rank Abernathy ahead of him

All in all for me Votto '10 would be my Reds poster child for a nomination followed by...
Hahn 1902
Dunn 2004
Seymour 1905
Abernathy 1967

Re: Reds Additions

PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 6:23 pm
by Rosie2167
Looked at Hahn a little closer, his 1904 yr looks like it could result in a better card. Anyone have an opinion on 1904 vs 1902?

Re: Reds Additions

PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 6:52 pm
by andycummings65
Votto is fine, I just prefer, in most instances, to fill poorly represented players or players with no card before recent cards. I know I'm probably in the minority on that, but I guess that's why they call it an opinion. :)

Re: Reds Additions

PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 7:12 pm
by visick
2003 Jose Guillen

Re: Reds Additions

PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 8:24 pm
by andycummings65
Rosie2167 wrote:Looked at Hahn a little closer, his 1904 yr looks like it could result in a better card. Anyone have an opinion on 1904 vs 1902?


The only thing I see better is a lower WHIP in 1904. His adjusted ERA is much better in 1902

Re: Reds Additions

PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 8:38 pm
by FRANKMANSUETO
You guys are taking ALL my thunder. I want to nominate a Red but you all have taken them. :lol: