- Posts: 1975
- Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:55 pm
Hi All - Yes sorry a little bit of a ATG Card Add hiatus.
Here's the breakdown of the 16.1 card add. And so that we all know which add we are referring to I'll use the old software revision technique and throw the year.# of add as our reference point...which gives us 16.1
So 16.1 yielded the following:
21 cards from EXP+ (2000-2015)
15 cards from EXP (1967 - 1999)
8 cards from Post War
4 cards from Pre War
2 cards from Dead Ball
10 Pitchers
40 Hitters
26 cards for a new Franchise
3 cards enabled a carded player for a new position
18 cards were for players without a current card in ATG - so 18 net new
17 cards for players with one current card
12 cards for players with two current cards
Franchise Breakdown, ranked by new $$ Added...the line below reads TOTAL CARDS ADDED/TOT $$ ADDED/NEW CARDS ADDED/NEW $$ ADDED. One set of numbers means both sets where the same. 0 = No New $$/New Cards added, just already carded players getting another card.
Angels - 2/16.99
Expos/Nats - 2/16.04
Padres - 3/13.88/2/13.34
Tigers - 5/17.28/2/12.79
White Sox - 3/14.25/3/12.34
Cubs - 2/12.34/1/9.85
Rangers - 1/9.58
Reds - 1/8.28
Royals - 1/7.21
Rays - 1/6.92
Rockies - 1/5.71
Mets - 2/10.16/1/5.63
Red Sox - 3/8.53/1/4.45
Brewers - 2/9.35/0
A's - 3/5.81/0
Cardinals - 2/5.27/0
Orioles/Browns - 1/5.22/0
Pirates - 3/4.83/0
Senators/Twins - 1/3.93/0
Braves - 2/3.67/0
Indians - 2/1.94/0
Dodgers - 1/1.89/0
Marlins - 1/1.75/0
Yankees - 2/1.47/0
Phillies - 2/.23/0
Overall seems pretty good with a decent franchise spread. EXP and Position player heavy, so something to consider for 16.2. As for 16.2 at a high level we can do the following:
1. Add the next 25 vote getters from 16.1
2. Add one historically significant 25 man roster not yet represented in ATG
3. Focus on a few underrepresented Franchises
4. Focus on missing players; such as any missing Cy Young winners or MVP's or record holders...
5. Do exactly what we did last time
My opinion is we focus 16.2 based on what we got in 16.1. So more pitchers (maybe 15/10 ratio), lean toward older cards (15/10). feedback?
The one note I took down during this process that made me pause was, should we add cards that best represent a players career or his best year. My answer to myself (yes I have those conversations sometimes) was ultimately both, so that sounds like yet another spreadsheet, nice! We also have the issue brought up by (who I can't recall sorry for the lack of publicity) regarding adding those lower end cards, the ones that help you fill out that roster. I believe the answer was by adding a whole team you get by default those bench guys, not sure how else to get that done, but I do think its something that needs to be batted about.
I'll be starting two additional topics this ATG Card Discussion forum to help (at least I think it will) focus the discussion...and yes I did come up with these titles all by myself.
Pitchers
Hitters
Genius I know! Obviously we can cross reference into the franchise strings as well.
Let's plan on determining our direction by late next week...so we can dive into the card discussions/voting and have something ready for John at SOM by mid Nov.
Here's the breakdown of the 16.1 card add. And so that we all know which add we are referring to I'll use the old software revision technique and throw the year.# of add as our reference point...which gives us 16.1
So 16.1 yielded the following:
21 cards from EXP+ (2000-2015)
15 cards from EXP (1967 - 1999)
8 cards from Post War
4 cards from Pre War
2 cards from Dead Ball
10 Pitchers
40 Hitters
26 cards for a new Franchise
3 cards enabled a carded player for a new position
18 cards were for players without a current card in ATG - so 18 net new
17 cards for players with one current card
12 cards for players with two current cards
Franchise Breakdown, ranked by new $$ Added...the line below reads TOTAL CARDS ADDED/TOT $$ ADDED/NEW CARDS ADDED/NEW $$ ADDED. One set of numbers means both sets where the same. 0 = No New $$/New Cards added, just already carded players getting another card.
Angels - 2/16.99
Expos/Nats - 2/16.04
Padres - 3/13.88/2/13.34
Tigers - 5/17.28/2/12.79
White Sox - 3/14.25/3/12.34
Cubs - 2/12.34/1/9.85
Rangers - 1/9.58
Reds - 1/8.28
Royals - 1/7.21
Rays - 1/6.92
Rockies - 1/5.71
Mets - 2/10.16/1/5.63
Red Sox - 3/8.53/1/4.45
Brewers - 2/9.35/0
A's - 3/5.81/0
Cardinals - 2/5.27/0
Orioles/Browns - 1/5.22/0
Pirates - 3/4.83/0
Senators/Twins - 1/3.93/0
Braves - 2/3.67/0
Indians - 2/1.94/0
Dodgers - 1/1.89/0
Marlins - 1/1.75/0
Yankees - 2/1.47/0
Phillies - 2/.23/0
Overall seems pretty good with a decent franchise spread. EXP and Position player heavy, so something to consider for 16.2. As for 16.2 at a high level we can do the following:
1. Add the next 25 vote getters from 16.1
2. Add one historically significant 25 man roster not yet represented in ATG
3. Focus on a few underrepresented Franchises
4. Focus on missing players; such as any missing Cy Young winners or MVP's or record holders...
5. Do exactly what we did last time
My opinion is we focus 16.2 based on what we got in 16.1. So more pitchers (maybe 15/10 ratio), lean toward older cards (15/10). feedback?
The one note I took down during this process that made me pause was, should we add cards that best represent a players career or his best year. My answer to myself (yes I have those conversations sometimes) was ultimately both, so that sounds like yet another spreadsheet, nice! We also have the issue brought up by (who I can't recall sorry for the lack of publicity) regarding adding those lower end cards, the ones that help you fill out that roster. I believe the answer was by adding a whole team you get by default those bench guys, not sure how else to get that done, but I do think its something that needs to be batted about.
I'll be starting two additional topics this ATG Card Discussion forum to help (at least I think it will) focus the discussion...and yes I did come up with these titles all by myself.
Pitchers
Hitters
Genius I know! Obviously we can cross reference into the franchise strings as well.
Let's plan on determining our direction by late next week...so we can dive into the card discussions/voting and have something ready for John at SOM by mid Nov.