Page 1 of 1

Should Pre-1893 players be added?

PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 1:49 pm
by STEVE F
Just a straw poll to gauge interest. This poll is not "officially" sanctioned by the ATG committee.

Re: Should Pre-1893 players be added?

PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:09 pm
by Salty
STEVE F wrote:Just a straw poll to gauge interest. This poll is not "officially" sanctioned by the ATG committee.


Thank you Steve.

I'm glad that my agreement that this poll isn't a bad idea wasn't taken as a tacit contract
that Id be leading this discussion by too many people. :D

Re: Should Pre-1893 players be added?

PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2018 5:00 pm
by Chris Franco
AL before 1903 or NL before 1901 should never be added to ATG in my opinion.
Foul balls were not counted as strikes.
Talk about apples and oranges!!!

Re: Should Pre-1893 players be added?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 06, 2018 12:40 am
by Radagast Brown
Only when Kelly Leak and Willie Mays Hays get their cards.... What a joke...