Page 2 of 2
Re: 22.3 Results
Posted:
Thu Jan 12, 2023 7:18 amby BC15NY
Greetings,
The 22.2 and 22.3 cards are in the set, along with the Diamond Gems Series A Negro League teams!
I'll post the card lists with salaries asap.
Enjoy!
Bill
Re: 22.3 Results
Posted:
Thu Jan 12, 2023 12:35 pmby Salty
oooohhh nice-
thanks Bill
Re: 22.3 Results
Posted:
Sat Jan 14, 2023 9:46 pmby MICHAELCHIOLINO
Want to thank Bill for his efforts! They don't go unnoticed. Just a question about Dave Koslo. His pitching End is S8, with no relief rating. Koslo had 38G, 23GS, 15CG, and 12GF indicating relief pitching. Andy had him as 8*,5Rel. Been looking forward to his addition to the set.
Thanks again, Mike
Re: 22.3 Results
Posted:
Sat Jan 14, 2023 10:21 pmby andycummings65
MICHAELCHIOLINO wrote:Want to thank Bill for his efforts! They don't go unnoticed. Just a question about Dave Koslo. His pitching End is S8, with no relief rating. Koslo had 38G, 23GS, 15CG, and 12GF indicating relief pitching. Andy had him as 8*,5Rel. Been looking forward to his addition to the set.
Thanks again, Mike
I had hoped he'd get the *, for sure. It's kind of nebulous around 200-215 IP as to when it is awarded.
I thought he'd get it; surprised he didn't.
Re: 22.3 Results
Posted:
Sun Jan 15, 2023 10:10 pmby MICHAELCHIOLINO
Thanks. Was expecting the card would be eligible for Relief work based on his appearances.
Re: 22.3 Results
Posted:
Sun Jan 15, 2023 11:40 pmby MaxPower
The pitcher x-chart only includes e-ratings up to 51 but several of the new NeL pitchers have an e-rating greater than that. Anyone know what to make of that?
Re: 22.3 Results
Posted:
Wed Jan 18, 2023 8:36 pmby childsmwc
I believe the e ratings got through some type of normalization to level across periods. I don’t knock it any of the specifics but I think above e51 is from this process and should have been capped at e51. I know when prices were set they were priced based on e51 ratings table, so likely just a display issue
Re: 22.3 Results
Posted:
Wed Jan 18, 2023 8:39 pmby MaxPower
childsmwc wrote:I believe the e ratings got through some type of normalization to level across periods. I don’t knock it any of the specifics but I think above e51 is from this process and should have been capped at e51. I know when prices were set they were priced based on e51 ratings table, so likely just a display issue
Very helpful thanks!
Re: 22.3 Results
Posted:
Wed Jan 18, 2023 8:49 pmby andycummings65
MaxPower wrote:childsmwc wrote:I believe the e ratings got through some type of normalization to level across periods. I don’t knock it any of the specifics but I think above e51 is from this process and should have been capped at e51. I know when prices were set they were priced based on e51 ratings table, so likely just a display issue
Very helpful thanks!
Yes, for Diamonddope I'm having to make some of the NeL pitchers an e51 when they are often e54's