HALL OF FAMERS who could use a better/different card

Discussion for new cards to add; moderated by Rosie2167

Moderator: BC15NY

  • Author
  • Message
Offline

andycummings65

  • Posts: 13496
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:42 pm

HALL OF FAMERS who could use a better/different card

PostMon May 15, 2023 12:58 pm

I was perusing the HOF and came upon some players who could use improvement here. This is All-Time Greats, after all.

1947 Pee Wee Reese, BKN, Bats-R, BAL-E, SS-1e28, 15 Game INJ Risk
LH—2b-7.5 3b-2.1 HR-1 BB-18 .314/.435/.479, .914 OPS
RH—2b-3 3b-0 HR-3.5 BB-28 .343/.519/.514, 1.033 OPS
1949 Pee Wee Reese, BKN, Bats-R, BAL-E, SS-1e18, IN-GAME INJ Risk ONLY
LH—2b-3.2 3b-0 HR-1.5 BB-25 .313/.479/.407, .886 OPS
RH—2b-3.3 3b-0.6 HR-2.6 BB-23 .300/.456/.446, .902 OPS
Current 1954 Pee Wee Reese, BKN, Bats-R, BAL-3L, SS-2e29, 3 Game INJ Risk
LH—2b-11.8 3b-1.6 HR-2.7 BB-16 .458/.543/.709, 1.252 OPS
RH—2b-6.7 3b-1.6 HR-0.5 BB-20 .348/.475/.477, .952 OPS

This ’47 or ’49 Reese is a 1 at SS, giving those 40s-50s Dodgers teams better up the middle defense.
Both have good OBP.

1912 Johnny Evers, CHC, Bats-L, BAL-E, 2b-1e34, Steal: *4-6,12/-(18-13), 15 Game INJ Risk
LH—2b-0.9 3b-2 HR-0 BB-19 .392/.505/.448, .952 OPS
RH—2b-4.3 3b-2.7 HR-0 BB-19 .451/.552/.560, 1.113 OPS
Current 1908 Johnny Evers, CHC, Bats-L, BAL-1R, 2b-1e14, Steal: *3-6/- (19-15), 15 Game INJ Risk
LH—2b-4.2 3b-1.2 HR-0 BB-21 .338/.473/.415, .888 OPS
RH—2b-5 3b-1.4 HR-0 BB-21 .410/.530/.500, 1.030 OPS

This is Evers best card. Errors will probably be mitigated somewhat by Strat.

1930 Pie Traynor, PIT, Bats-R, BAL-1R, 3b-1e31, 15 Game INJ Risk
LH—2b-3.3 3b-1 HR-1.5 BB-10 .444/.495/.543, 1.039 OPS
RH—2b-2.8 3b-4 HR-1.8 BB-11 .442/.499/.607, 1.106 OPS
Current 1929 Pie Traynor, PIT, Bats-R, BAL-E, 3b-1e22, 15 Game INJ Risk
LH—2b-4.5 3b-3.3 HR-0.2 BB-2 .426/.442/.536, .978 OPS
RH—2b-4.5 3b-3.3 HR-0.3 BB-2 .420/.437/.533, .970 OPS

This is Pie Traynor’s best card. Was believed to be the best 3b in baseball for 50 years until Mike Schmidt came along (don’t know who everyone thought Eddie Mathews was….)

1951 Roy Campanella, BKN, Bats-R, 6L Balance, C-1(-4)e4
LH--14.8 2b, 0 3b, 15.3 HR, 4 BB 494/522/1.087, 1.609 OPS
RH--6.9 HR, 0 3b, 7.6 HR, 6 BB 364/411/661, 1.072 OPS
Current 1950 Campanella, 5.49m, BKN, Bats-R, 4L Balance, C-1(-3)e6
LH--6.3 2b, 0.6 3b, 16.3 HR, 9 BB 379/437/954, 1.391 OPS
RH--2.4 2b, 0.5 3b, 8.8 HR, 13 Bb 276/370/593, .963 OPS

This 51 Campanella is a LH masher and better than the current LH masher Campanella. He won the MVP in ’51.

1944 Lou Boudreau, CLE, Bats-R, BAL-E, SS-1e19, 3 Game INJ Risk
LH—2b-9.6 3b-1 HR-0 BB-14 .385/.470/.509, .980 OPS
RH—2b-9.4 3b-0.8 HR-0 BB-14 .375/.462/.492, .955 OPS
Current 1948 Lou Boudreau, CLE, Bats-R, BAL-1L, SS-1e18, 3 Game INJ Risk
LH—2b-6.6 3b-1 HR-7.5 BB-23 .480/.595/.850, 1.445 OPS
RH—2b-6.6 3b-1 HR-3.2 BB-17 .469/.557/.669, 1.226 OPS
Current 1947 Lou Boudreau, CLE, Bats-R, BAL-E, SS-1e12, 3 Game INJ Risk
LH—2b-10.8 3b-0.3 HR-0 BB-12 .372/.447/.491, .938 OPS
RH—2b-10.6 3b-0.3 HR-0 BB-12 .367/.443/.484, .928 OPS

This Boudreau compares favorably to the ’47 card, better offensively. Also gives the Pre-CLE set a good SS.

1937 Lefty Gomez, NYY, Throws-L, BAL-E, S8*
LH—2b-0.3 3b-0 HR-0.3 BB-7 .129/.186/.140, .325 OPS
RH—2b-0.3 3b-0 HR-0.2 BB-7 .124/.181/.133, .314 OPS
Current 1934 Lefty Gomez, NYY, Throws-L, BAL-2L, S9*
LH—2b-0 3b-0 HR-1.7 BB-7 .056/.118/.107, .225 OPS
RH—2b-1.2 3b-0.5 HR-1.1 BB-8 .124/.189/.179, .368 OPS

Another great ace, a little more balanced.

1937 Johnny Mize, STL, Bats-L, BAL-E, 1b-4e18, 3 Game INJ Risk
LH—2b-8.6 3b-1.5 HR-8.3 BB-10 .479/.532/.854, 1.386 OPS
RH—2b-8.5 3b-1.5 HR-8 BB-10 .469/.523/.833, 1.356 OPS
1938 Johnny Mize, STL, Bats-L, BAL-7R, 1b-4e17, 3 Game INJ Risk
LH—2b-0.6 3b-7.1 HR-1.4 BB-4 .250/.291/.436, .727 OPS
RH—2b-8.9 3b-3.5 HR-9.1 BB-18 .447/.549/.938, 1.487 OPS
1939 Johnny Mize, STL, Bats-L, BAL-1R, 1b-4e19, 3 Game INJ Risk
LH—2b-8.2 3b-3.5 HR-8 BB-20 .434/.544/.883, 1.427, OPS
RH—2b-8.8 3b-3.8 HR-8.8 BB-20 .468/.571/.960, 1.531 OPS
Current 1940 Johnny Mize, STL, Bats-L, BAL-E, 1b-4e12, 3 Game INJ Risk
LH—2b-5.1 3b-3.3 HR-13.3 BB-17 .393/.494/.966, 1.460 OPS
RH—2b-5.1 3b-3.3 HR-13 BB-17 .390/.492/.952, 1.444 OPS

None of these cards can beat ’40 Mize for power, but that ’39 card is very strong. Does everything better than ’40 except HRs.

1936 Arky Vaughan, PIT, Bats-L, BAL-E, SS-2e45, 3 Game INJ Risk
LH—2b-4.3 3b-2.6 HR-2.4 BB-27 .419/.569/.626, 1.196 OPS
RH—2b-4.4 3b-2.6 HR-2.3 BB-27 .419/.569/.622, 1.192 OPS
Current 1935 Arky Vaughan, PIT, Bats-L, BAL-E, SS-2e27, 15 Game INJ Risk
LH—2b-6.8 3b-2.5 HR-7.3 BB-26 .541/.656/.956, 1.612 OPS
RH—2b-6.8 3b-2.5 HR-7 BB-26 .531/.648/.936, 1.584 OPS
Current 1934 Arky Vaughan, PIT, Bats-L, BAL-1R, SS-3e29, 3 Game INJ Risk
LH—2b-2.8 3b-1.8 HR-0 BB-22 .438/.557/.513, 1.070 OPS
RH—2b-9.5 3b-2.7 HR-3.5 BB-21 .377/.504/.670, 1.174 OPS

His ’35 card is one of a kind, but a nice cheaper alternative would be the ’36 card. It’s better than ’34 and has better defense (Strat should mitigate some of those errors).
Last edited by andycummings65 on Mon May 15, 2023 4:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Offline

STEVE F

  • Posts: 4212
  • Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:08 pm

Re: HALL OF FAMERS who could use a better/different card

PostMon May 15, 2023 3:34 pm

Thanks Andy, these are ALL great recs!
Offline

Mattw0909

  • Posts: 214
  • Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 9:41 pm

Re: HALL OF FAMERS who could use a better/different card

PostMon May 15, 2023 6:00 pm

I’m a big believer in the more cards the better. Especially for players in the hall of fame. I’ve said a few times on these boards , if it were up to me all mvp , & cy young seasons would be included and each hall of famer would have 4/5 cards to choose from. Great post. If you need help identifying more guys let me know. I can think of a few off the top of my head without looking
Offline

MICHAELCHIOLINO

  • Posts: 79
  • Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:38 pm

Re: HALL OF FAMERS who could use a better/different card

PostMon May 15, 2023 7:11 pm

Think I'll nominate the '49 Reese. Great defense, stolen base percentage, and durability. But how can a player that plays 155 games and have 743 PA's not have a 0 Injury rating?
Offline

andycummings65

  • Posts: 13496
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:42 pm

Re: HALL OF FAMERS who could use a better/different card

PostMon May 15, 2023 7:14 pm

MICHAELCHIOLINO wrote:Think I'll nominate the '49 Reese. Great defense, stolen base percentage, and durability. But how can a player that plays 155 games and have 743 PA's not have a 0 Injury rating?


You'll have to ask Strat that one
Offline

AndyP92072

  • Posts: 26
  • Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 3:57 pm

Re: HALL OF FAMERS who could use a better/different card

PostSat May 20, 2023 7:05 am

MICHAELCHIOLINO wrote:Think I'll nominate the '49 Reese. Great defense, stolen base percentage, and durability. But how can a player that plays 155 games and have 743 PA's not have a 0 Injury rating?


The Dodgers played 156 games in 1949. Two ties were later replayed.
Offline

andycummings65

  • Posts: 13496
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:42 pm

Re: HALL OF FAMERS who could use a better/different card

PostSat May 20, 2023 10:28 am

AndyP92072 wrote:
MICHAELCHIOLINO wrote:Think I'll nominate the '49 Reese. Great defense, stolen base percentage, and durability. But how can a player that plays 155 games and have 743 PA's not have a 0 Injury rating?


The Dodgers played 156 games in 1949. Two ties were later replayed.


That's why the '36 Gehrig is not bulletproof. So, Strat counts those ties as games played by the team yet does NOT give the players credit for playing in them when it comes to the games played injury formula.
Offline

Big Willie

  • Posts: 53
  • Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2017 3:27 pm

Re: HALL OF FAMERS who could use a better/different card

PostMon May 22, 2023 12:38 pm

I would respectfully like to add 1974 Willie Stargell to Andy's list. Less power than other Stargell cards, but more balanced. 1974 was the last year Stargell was rated as a 3 in LF. His numbers are below:

1974 Willie Stargell, Pirates, LHB, LF 3(-4 )e11 1B 4e15 .301 25 96 .407 Career bests in BB & OBP. Near career bests in H, 2B, BA, OPS & OPS+. Led NL in OPS and OPS+. Besides having less power than other Stargell cards, this is a different type of Stargell card, as it is about the only Stargell card that hits lefties as well as righties. It was the last year that Stargell was a 3 in LF. Being rated at first base is a nice bonus.


1974 Willie Stargell PIT Bats-L BAL-1R LF-3(-4)e11, 1b-4e15 INJ Risk-15
LH—2b-7.9 3b-0.3 HR-7.0 BB-9 .331/.406/.638 OPS-1.044
RH—2b-9.5 3b-0.9 HR-7.0 BB-19 .342/.476/.717 OPS-1.193
Current 1971 Stargell, Willie PIT Bats-L BAL-6R LF-3(-4)e6
LH—2b-8.2 3b-0 HR-10.2 BB-9 .233/.318/637 OPS-.955
RH—2b-3.3 3b-0 HR-20 BB-18 .408/.523/1.135 OPS-1.658
Current 1973 Stargell, Willie PIT Bats-L BAL-3R LF-4(-4)e8
LH—2b-10.2 3b-0 HR-12.5 BB-12 .309/.392/.811 OPS-1.203
RH—3b-12.1 3b-0.9 HR-16.3 BB-13 .368/.450/1.036 OPS-1.486
Offline

ratioman2

  • Posts: 477
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:06 pm

Re: HALL OF FAMERS who could use a better/different card

PostWed May 31, 2023 5:13 pm

We can get Killebrew off the waiver wire. He has only 3 even cards, at 2L E and 1R. 1959 is a 7L, with 8 Ball Park Homeruns vs righties. Usable at all is a big improvement for this Hall of Famer
Offline

andycummings65

  • Posts: 13496
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:42 pm

Re: HALL OF FAMERS who could use a better/different card

PostWed May 31, 2023 7:28 pm

ratioman2 wrote:We can get Killebrew off the waiver wire. He has only 3 even cards, at 2L E and 1R. 1959 is a 7L, with 8 Ball Park Homeruns vs righties. Usable at all is a big improvement for this Hall of Famer


I did a study on Killebrew a couple years back. I'll find it and repost.



Some players don't seem to translate as well to Strat, and I feel like Harmon Killebrew is one of them.
Below are the DD stats (vets75) from the current Killebrew cards:

1961 Killebrew 6.66m, E Balance, 1b-4e17 / 3b-5e40 / lf-5(+3)e12
LH--0 2b, 1.5 3b, 9.6 HR, 41 BB, 373/617/855, 1.467 OPS
RH--3 2b, 1.9 3b, 15 HR, 21 BB, 333/469/932, 1.401 OPS
Probably best current card, only usable at 1b

1965 Killebrew 3.89m, 2L Balance, 1b-4e16 / 3b-4e16 / lf-5(+2)e7
LH--2.4 2b, 1 3b, 8 HR, 34 BB, 378/586/773, 1.359 OPS
RH--3.6 2b, 0 3b, 10.4 HR, 14 BB, 285/391/664, 1.055 OPS
The 2 INJ card, usable at 1b & 3b

1969 Killebrew 6.77m, 1R Balance, 3b-4e35 / 1b-4e5
LH--0 2b, 0 3b, 10.3 HR, 37 BB, 228/507/674, 1.174 OPS
RH--5.3 2b, 0.3 3b, 11.3 HR, 25 BB 298/473/786, 1.259 OPS
The Bulletproof card, usable at 1b, not so much at 3b



Here are a few other Killebrew cards to consider:
1959 Killebrew 7L Balance, 3b-4e32 / LF-4(+3) 16
LH--7.1 2b, 0 3b, 14.1 HR, 26 BB 506/639/1.132, 1.771 OPS
RH--1.7 2b, 0.3 3b, 10.5 HR, 20 BB 212/380/609, .989 OPS
This card would be a LHP masher as a 3b or DH...…Led League in HR

1960 Killebrew 2L Balance, 1b-4e20 / 3b-4e29
LH--0 2b, 0 3b, 10 HR, 36 BB, 399/599/815, 1.414 OPS
RH--3.3 2b, 0 3b, 9.8 HR, 17 BB 282/395/641, 1.036 OPS
At least usable at both 1b & 3b, 2 INJ

1964 Killebrew 2L Balance, LF-4(+1)e7
LH--0.2 2b, 0 3b, 14.5 HR, 29 BB 378/562/952, 1.514 OPS
RH--0 2b, 0 3b, 12.2 HR, 18 BB 299/435/720, 1.155 OPS
Maybe his best combined HR numbers against both sides. He's usable in LF, and with his '4" there, I feel like this card would be cheaper, but still provide nice offense. Led League in HR

I wish there was a card that inspired as much fear as the real Killebrew did in the 1960s, when he led the league in HR 6 times and RBI 3 times. Sadly, he's not used as often as he should be.
Next

Return to --- ATG Card Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests