Mandatory Penalty(?) Negates a 75 yrd run
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 2:15 am
Does anyone have access to the actual Card and Dice adv/super-adv Penalty split charts to assist in clarifying the following...
Can you clarify if there are any Defensive penalties which MUST be accepted by the offense, or are the MANDATORY penalties offensive only?
According to the play-by-play, I (GOL) apparently had a 75-yrd run negated by a 0-yrd penalty(?) on the defense (Brooklyn). This was a MANDATORY(?) acceptance penalty and thus, it negated the run gain. Is there a coach out there that would actually decline this type of penalty, if given the choice? I'll admit to not following pro football much these last few years, but is there an instance in real life that a penalty on the defense must be accepted and therefore negate a substantial gain by the offense? If it were an off-sides or some other prior-to-the-snap variety...wouldn't that be reflected in the following Line of Scrimmage?
One possibility is that the PbP account is wrong and the penalty is actually on Golden instead of Brooklyn...
Here's the play-by-play...any insightful assistance would be appreciated.
1-10 GOL 23
(6:05) End Run - Right (Blocking Back 1HB) [D: 4-3, Pass]
Run
LeSean McCoy (HB): 75 yards
Tackle
Prince Amukamara (LCB)
Penalty On
Brooklyn: 0 yards
Penalty Mandatory
1-10 GOL 23
(5:46) End Run - Left (Blocking Back 1HB) [D: 4-3, Pass]
OBB
Mike Tolbert (BB): Good Play
Run
LeSean McCoy (HB): 3 yards
Tackle
Ahmad Brooks (RLB)
Injury
Eli Harold (LLB)
Can you clarify if there are any Defensive penalties which MUST be accepted by the offense, or are the MANDATORY penalties offensive only?
According to the play-by-play, I (GOL) apparently had a 75-yrd run negated by a 0-yrd penalty(?) on the defense (Brooklyn). This was a MANDATORY(?) acceptance penalty and thus, it negated the run gain. Is there a coach out there that would actually decline this type of penalty, if given the choice? I'll admit to not following pro football much these last few years, but is there an instance in real life that a penalty on the defense must be accepted and therefore negate a substantial gain by the offense? If it were an off-sides or some other prior-to-the-snap variety...wouldn't that be reflected in the following Line of Scrimmage?
One possibility is that the PbP account is wrong and the penalty is actually on Golden instead of Brooklyn...
Here's the play-by-play...any insightful assistance would be appreciated.
1-10 GOL 23
(6:05) End Run - Right (Blocking Back 1HB) [D: 4-3, Pass]
Run
LeSean McCoy (HB): 75 yards
Tackle
Prince Amukamara (LCB)
Penalty On
Brooklyn: 0 yards
Penalty Mandatory
1-10 GOL 23
(5:46) End Run - Left (Blocking Back 1HB) [D: 4-3, Pass]
OBB
Mike Tolbert (BB): Good Play
Run
LeSean McCoy (HB): 3 yards
Tackle
Ahmad Brooks (RLB)
Injury
Eli Harold (LLB)