"Unleashed" players

Moderator: Palmtana

  • Author
  • Message
Offline

edub1969

  • Posts: 10253
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:21 pm

"Unleashed" players

PostSun Feb 03, 2013 11:48 am

Is there a way to know which players will be considered "unleashed" in the upcoming set due to their lack of AB's or IP's? Does the ratings book or ratings download show it?

Thanks in advance!
Offline

visick

  • Posts: 5876
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:25 pm
  • Location: Huntington Beach via NYC

Re: "Unleashed" players

PostSun Feb 03, 2013 1:27 pm

http://somonline.wikia.com/wiki/Fluke_cards

It's Stratomatics decision.

The ratings download does NOT show if they are unleashed or not. Just pure #'s.
Offline

edub1969

  • Posts: 10253
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:21 pm

Re: "Unleashed" players

PostSun Feb 03, 2013 1:38 pm

visick wrote:http://somonline.wikia.com/wiki/Fluke_cards

It's Stratomatics decision.

The ratings download does NOT show if they are unleashed or not. Just pure #'s.


Thanks visick! So we won't know until the online version comes out :(
Offline

Ninersphan

  • Posts: 11876
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:30 pm
  • Location: Near Roanoke VA

Re: "Unleashed" players

PostSun Feb 03, 2013 1:48 pm

edub1969 wrote:Is there a way to know which players will be considered "unleashed" in the upcoming set due to their lack of AB's or IP's? Does the ratings book or ratings download show it?

Thanks in advance!



Not really because there are no hard fast rules for exclusion from the regular set. That said we can make some educated guesses based on past decisions.

First, all computer only players are not included, if you have the Ratings book they are indicated in bold face, if you have the download, they have an X in the location column next to their name.

Now the GENERAL rule of thumb for inclusion is that a pitcher has to have at least 25 IP's and a batter has to have at least 75 PA's unless it's a catcher. Sometimes limited PA cathers get in. Then it's simply common sense, if it's a dominate card, especially one that could potentially win a post season stat category if given a whole season, ( Most HR's, highest BA, Strikeouts etc) then the card could wind up in the unleashed set, this is especialy true for Rookies and guys that have one year wonder, type seasons even if they have a big injury.

Some guys I think might be in Unleashed:

Nolan Reimold
Irving Falu
Brandon Moss , even with the high PA's
Jeff Keppinger, Ditto, though he'll likly make it in the regular set
J Ruggiano
J Lucroy, he probably makes it though.
Travis Snider
P Kozma- this is the poster child type player for the Unleashed set this year.

I haven't looked at the pitchers yet. One thing with pitchers, a S/R will need to have made at least 4 starts to keep his Starter desigantion if he has a really good card. Many times the on-line game has pulled the starter designation from those guys leaving them as only an R3.

I know this wasn't a definitive answer, but I hope it helps.
Last edited by Ninersphan on Sun Feb 03, 2013 1:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Offline

edub1969

  • Posts: 10253
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:21 pm

Re: "Unleashed" players

PostSun Feb 03, 2013 1:55 pm

Ninersphan wrote:
edub1969 wrote:Is there a way to know which players will be considered "unleashed" in the upcoming set due to their lack of AB's or IP's? Does the ratings book or ratings download show it?

Thanks in advance!



Not really because there are no hard fast rules for exclusion from the regular set. That said we can make some educated guesses based on past decisions.

First, all computer only players are not included, if you have the Ratings book they are indicated in bold face, if you have the download, they have an X in the location column next to their name.

Now the GENERAL rule of thumb for inclusion is that a pitcher has at least about 25 ip's and a batter has at least about 75 pa's unless it's a catchers sometimes limited PA cathers get in. The it's simply common sense, if it's a domminate cards especially one that could potentially win a post season Stat category if given a whole season, ( Most HR's, highest BA, Strikeouts etc) then the card could wind up in the unleashed set, this is especialy true for Rookies and guys that have one year wonder, type seasons even if they have a big injury.

Some guys I think might be in unleashed:

Nolan Reimold
Irving Falu
Brandon Moss , even with the high PA's
Jeff Keppinger, Ditto, though he'll likly make it in the regular set
J Ruggiano
J Lucroy, he probably makes it though.
Travis Snider
P Kozma- this is the poster child type player for the Unleashed set this year.

I haven't looked at the pitchers yet. One thing with pitchers, a S/R will need to have made at least 4 starts to keep his Starter desigantion if he has a really good card. Many times the on-line game has pulled the starter designation from those guys leaving them as only an R3.

I know this wasn't a definitive answer, but I hope it helps.


Thanks ninersphan! Yeah I figured Kozma would be a definite unleashed player. So Lance Lynn in 2011 set and a few others from your last explanation is why the starter designation wasn't in the online version?

Thanks again!
Offline

Ninersphan

  • Posts: 11876
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:30 pm
  • Location: Near Roanoke VA

Re: "Unleashed" players

PostSun Feb 03, 2013 1:57 pm

edub1969 wrote:
Thanks ninersphan! Yeah I figured Kozma would be a definite unleashed player. So Lance Lynn in 2011 set and a few others from your last explanation is why the starter designation wasn't in the online version?

Thanks again!



Yup. :D
Offline

schnoogens

  • Posts: 744
  • Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 7:59 am

Re: "Unleashed" players

PostSun Feb 03, 2013 3:30 pm

I'd be shocked if Brandon Moss doesn't get a card. 84 games, 291 ABs. I know his vs RHP split is extreme (1.006 OPS) and his dice rolls are accordingly insane, but if they price his card correctly it won't be a problem.
Offline

Ninersphan

  • Posts: 11876
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:30 pm
  • Location: Near Roanoke VA

Re: "Unleashed" players

PostSun Feb 03, 2013 3:57 pm

schnoogens wrote:I'd be shocked if Brandon Moss doesn't get a card. 84 games, 291 ABs. I know his vs RHP split is extreme (1.006 OPS) and his dice rolls are accordingly insane, but if they price his card correctly it won't be a problem.



I'm just gonna lay this out there one more time ( the example that got me on my crusade/soapbox to include all the cards all the time)

Carlos Baerga 2003: .343 ba .396obp .464 slg .859 OPS this card with 231 plate appearences was EXCLUDED, I'll say again EXCLUDED :shock: :evil: :shock: :evil: (yes still bitter.)

Brandon Moss 2012: .291 ba .358 obp .596 slg .954 OPS in 296 plate appearences...

so there is a precendent. :o :shock:


You have been warned. ;)
Offline

fredpaii

  • Posts: 6465
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:54 pm

Re: "Unleashed" players

PostSun Feb 03, 2013 4:56 pm

I can see it happening with Moss. Especially since he's never come close to those numbers before. Baerga surprises me. He was a known good hitter by that time, wasn't he?
Offline

fredpaii

  • Posts: 6465
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:54 pm

Re: "Unleashed" players

PostSun Feb 03, 2013 5:04 pm

Do we have any evidence that Strat will continue the Unleashed players? isn't that something born from the TSN group?
Next

Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball 365 20xx

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: clevchad and 17 guests